Last updated: April 2026 · 8 min read · Audience: Authors, students, early-career researchers · Reading level: Introductory
Introduction
Early career — postdocs, assistant professors, recent PhDs — is when the publication record is being built. Decisions made now affect the record for decades. The pressure to publish often pushes early-career researchers toward fast or easy venues, which can be a long-term mistake.
This page addresses the considerations specific to early career. The principles overlap with general journal selection but the priorities differ.
Priorities at the early-career stage
| Priority | Why it matters early |
|---|---|
| Indexing | The publication record is what hiring committees see |
| Substantive peer review | Feedback shapes the researcher's development |
| Editorial responsiveness | Limited time for back-and-forth |
| Timeline compatibility | Grants and tenure clocks have hard deadlines |
| Reputation in field | Builds professional standing |
Practical guidance
- Build a small set of strong publications rather than many weak ones.
- Target journals where the work fits, not the most prestigious available; misfits waste time.
- Treat reviewer feedback as developmental, not as obstacles. The feedback is the value.
- Plan publication timing around grant cycles and review milestones.
- Develop relationships with editors at journals you publish in repeatedly; they remember good authors.
Common early-career mistakes
Other patterns: targeting only high-prestige journals where acceptance is unlikely (wastes years on rejections); targeting only easy journals (produces a record that does not stand up); failing to engage with reviewer feedback substantively (misses developmental opportunities).
Decision guidance
If choosing between a strong specialty journal and a weak generalist journal, the specialty journal is almost always the better choice for an early-career publication. Building a record in the field's recognised venues compounds across years.
Example scenarios
Scenario: a postdoc preparing for the academic job market
Postdocs typically have 1–3 years to build a publication record before job applications. Three to five publications in well-indexed disciplinary journals usually outperform ten publications in weaker venues. Quality over quantity is consistently the right strategy.
Scenario: an assistant professor on the tenure clock
Tenure cases are evaluated on indexed publications and citation impact. Publishing efficiently in well-indexed journals — and engaging with reviewer feedback substantively — builds both the count and the impact. Targeting venues whose readers cite the work matters.
Scenario: a recent PhD with limited publication record
Recent PhDs often face pressure to publish quickly. The strategic move is usually one or two strong publications from the thesis, not ten weak ones. Each strong publication compounds in citations and reputation; weak publications often do neither.
What to do next
Identify two or three journals where your current work fits and where the journal's audience matches your target career path. Submit deliberately. Authors targeting EP Journals Group venues can use the central submission form.
Frequently asked questions
Related topics across the knowledge centre
Guide
Avoiding Plagiarism in Academic Research
A clear explanation of what counts as plagiarism in academic research, how to avoid it in practice, and how journals detect and respond to it.
Guide
What is Indexing in Academic Journals?
An overview of how academic indexing operates, the principal categories of indexing services, and the implications of indexing status for authors and journals.
Comparison
EP Journals vs Predatory Journals: How to Tell the Difference
A practical comparison helping researchers distinguish legitimate structured open-access publishers, such as EP Journals, from predatory journals that lack genuine peer review, transparent fees, or verifiable editorial governance.
Comparison
Indexed vs Non-Indexed Journals: A Practical Comparison
A practical comparison of indexed and non-indexed journals across multiple indexing tiers, helping authors interpret indexing claims accurately and choose venues whose indexing matches their needs.
Publishing
Low-Cost Research Journals
Low-cost journals span subscription venues with no author fee, diamond open-access journals fully subsidised by institutions, and open-access journals with modest APCs. Verifying credibility matters more than the headline number.
Publishing
How to Publish a Research Paper in Law
A practical, field-specific guide to publishing research in law, covering norms, challenges, the step-by-step process, where to publish, and how to choose between journal types.
Resource
Journals for Students: Where to Publish Early Research
Students are typically best served by open-access journals that maintain transparent peer review, modest article processing charges (APCs), and clearly documented timelines.
Resource
Journals for Multidisciplinary Research
Multidisciplinary work fits journals explicitly oriented toward cross-field research, generalist scientific journals, or specialty journals where the work's primary discipline anchors. The choice depends on which audience the work most needs to reach.
Related reading and next steps
- Submission portal — Submit a manuscript through the central form
- Journals list — Six peer-reviewed journals across disciplines
- Journals for first-time researchers
- Writing a research paper step by step
- Peer-reviewed vs not
- Publishing in engineering
Editorial enquiries
Questions about this guide or about preparing a manuscript for submission may be directed to the editorial office. Where a query relates to a specific journal in the portfolio, please indicate the journal abbreviation in your message.
Email: editor@ep-journals.org