Last updated: 29 April 2026 · 10 min read · Audience: Authors, students, early-career researchers · Reading level: Introductory
A research paper is not written in the order in which it is read. Experienced authors construct the manuscript in a sequence that reflects the relative stability of each section: methods and results are written first because they are anchored in completed work, while the introduction and abstract are refined last because they must accurately represent what the paper ultimately demonstrates.
Step 1 — Outline before drafting
Before any prose is written, a one-page outline should list the central claim, the supporting subclaims, and the evidence assigned to each. This outline becomes the skeleton against which every paragraph is later checked.
Step 2 — Draft the methods
Methods are typically the most factual and least interpretive section. Drafting them first produces an early sense of momentum and forces the author to confirm that procedures are described with sufficient precision to permit replication.
Step 3 — Draft the results
Results should be reported neutrally, in the order required by the research questions. Each table and figure should be referenced in the text and accompanied by a one- to two-sentence factual description without interpretation.
Step 4 — Draft the discussion
The discussion interprets the results, situates them within the existing literature, and acknowledges limitations. A common organising pattern is: principal finding, comparison with prior work, mechanism or explanation, limitations, and implications.
Step 5 — Draft the introduction
The introduction is written after the discussion because the framing of the problem must match what the paper actually delivers. A standard structure proceeds from broad context to specific gap to research question and stated contribution.
Step 6 — Write the abstract and title last
Both the abstract and the title are condensations of the finished manuscript. Drafting them at the end avoids the common error of promising findings that the paper does not support.
Step 7 — Revise in passes
- Structural pass — verifies that each section answers the question it is meant to answer.
- Argument pass — confirms that every claim is supported by evidence or citation.
- Language pass — addresses clarity, concision, and disciplinary register.
- Reference pass — checks completeness, format, and presence of every cited work.
Key points
- The paper is drafted in a different order than it is read.
- Methods and results provide the factual anchor for the rest of the manuscript.
- Introduction, abstract, and title are written last and must align with the discussion.
- Revision should occur in distinct passes, each with a single objective.
Frequently asked questions
Related topics across the knowledge centre
Comparison
EP Journals vs Predatory Journals: How to Tell the Difference
A practical comparison helping researchers distinguish legitimate structured open-access publishers, such as EP Journals, from predatory journals that lack genuine peer review, transparent fees, or verifiable editorial governance.
Comparison
Indexed vs Non-Indexed Journals: A Practical Comparison
A practical comparison of indexed and non-indexed journals across multiple indexing tiers, helping authors interpret indexing claims accurately and choose venues whose indexing matches their needs.
Publishing
Low-Cost Research Journals
Low-cost journals span subscription venues with no author fee, diamond open-access journals fully subsidised by institutions, and open-access journals with modest APCs. Verifying credibility matters more than the headline number.
Publishing
How to Publish a Research Paper in Law
A practical, field-specific guide to publishing research in law, covering norms, challenges, the step-by-step process, where to publish, and how to choose between journal types.
Resource
Journals for Students: Where to Publish Early Research
Students are typically best served by open-access journals that maintain transparent peer review, modest article processing charges (APCs), and clearly documented timelines.
Resource
Journals for Multidisciplinary Research
Multidisciplinary work fits journals explicitly oriented toward cross-field research, generalist scientific journals, or specialty journals where the work's primary discipline anchors. The choice depends on which audience the work most needs to reach.
Guide
Avoiding Plagiarism in Academic Research
A clear explanation of what counts as plagiarism in academic research, how to avoid it in practice, and how journals detect and respond to it.
Guide
What is Indexing in Academic Journals?
An overview of how academic indexing operates, the principal categories of indexing services, and the implications of indexing status for authors and journals.
Related reading and next steps
Editorial enquiries
Questions about this guide or about preparing a manuscript for submission may be directed to the editorial office. Where a query relates to a specific journal in the portfolio, please indicate the journal abbreviation in your message.
Email: editor@ep-journals.org