EP Journals Group logo
EP Journals GroupAcademic Publishing Organisation
Submit Paper
HomeAboutJournalsArticlesIndexingAuthor GuidelinesPublication ProcessEditorial BoardPoliciesContact

Knowledge Centre · Publishing

How to Publish a Research Paper in Law

A practical guide to publishing research in law

Last updated: January 2026 · 4 min read · Audience: Authors, students, early-career researchers · Reading level: Introductory

This publishing reference is part of the Knowledge Centre maintained by EP Journals Group, an open access publisher of six peer-reviewed academic journals covering engineering and technology, economics and finance, management, natural sciences, social sciences, and education and finance. All journals operate under documented double-blind peer review with two independent reviewers, assign CrossRef DOIs on acceptance, and publish under a CC BY 4.0 licence.
To publish a research paper in law, identify a clear contribution, prepare the manuscript in the discipline's accepted format (Bluebook or OSCOLA), and select a journal whose scope, indexing, review timeline (10 to 20 weeks), and publication fee match the work and the author's career stage. Structured low-cost peer-reviewed journals such as those in the EP Journals group are one of several legitimate options alongside indexed society and commercial titles.

Introduction to publishing in law

Publishing a research paper in law requires more than producing results. It involves matching the work to a venue whose scope, audience, and editorial standards are appropriate, and following the disciplinary conventions that reviewers expect. This page outlines how publishing operates in law, the most common challenges authors face, a step-by-step process, where to publish, and how to choose between journal types based on the author's situation.

The recommendations here are presented neutrally. EP Journals is one publisher among many, and the goal of this page is to help researchers in law make informed decisions, not to direct them to any single venue.

How publishing works in law

In law, the dominant editorial conventions include Bluebook, OSCOLA, or ILI citation styles, footnote-heavy referencing, doctrinal or comparative methodology, and long-form essay structure rather than IMRaD. The typical first-decision time across reputable venues is 10 to 20 weeks. Authors are expected to engage with current literature, follow ethical and methodological standards specific to the discipline, and respond constructively to peer review.

Key points

  • Standard formatting: Bluebook or OSCOLA
  • Typical first-decision time: 10 to 20 weeks
  • Peer review is generally double-blind or single-blind, depending on the venue.
  • Indexing in recognised databases improves citation visibility and institutional recognition.

Common challenges in law publishing

  • Citation density is extremely high; some articles contain more footnotes than paragraphs.
  • Many leading law reviews are student-edited and follow expedite-and-offer practices unfamiliar to other disciplines.
  • Doctrinal work must be current; legislative or judicial changes during review can require substantial rewriting.
  • Comparative and empirical legal research requires careful jurisdictional framing.
  • Plagiarism thresholds are stricter because legal writing reuses statutory and case language extensively, which similarity software flags.

Step-by-step publishing process for law

  1. Identify a legal question, doctrinal gap, or comparative issue with current relevance.
  2. Conduct primary research across statutes, case law, and authoritative commentaries.
  3. Develop an argument structure: introduction, doctrinal analysis, critique, comparative or empirical insight, and conclusion.
  4. Apply the required citation style consistently throughout footnotes.
  5. Verify every citation, including pinpoint references and parallel citations where relevant.
  6. Select a journal whose jurisdictional and thematic focus matches the paper.
  7. Submit and respond to editorial queries, particularly those concerning citation form and statutory currency.

Tips to improve acceptance chances

  • Lead with a clear thesis statement in the introduction.
  • Avoid excessive block quotation; paraphrase and cite instead.
  • Update statutory and case references in the final week before submission.
  • Use a citation manager configured for the required style.
  • Submit to journals whose recent issues address adjacent themes.

Where to publish research in law

Several types of venues serve law research. The right choice depends on the contribution's maturity, the author's career stage, the available budget, and the indexing requirements imposed by the institution or funder. The table below summarises the main options.

Journal typeTypical APCReview timeBest suited for
University law reviewsUsually free12 – 26 weeksDoctrinal and comparative scholarship
Indexed legal journalsUSD 0 – 1,50012 – 24 weeksEmpirical and interdisciplinary work
Structured low-cost journalsUSD 30 – 1503 – 6 weeksStudents, advocates, early-career scholars
Practitioner bar journalsOften free6 – 12 weeksPractice-oriented commentary

Decision guidance: which type of journal to choose

Choose a traditional indexed journal when the work is novel, theoretically substantial, and the author can wait several months for the review process. This route maximises citation visibility and is often required for tenure, promotion, or doctoral defence committees that emphasise indexing.

Choose a structured low-cost peer-reviewed journal when the timeline is constrained, the budget is limited, and a transparent, documented review process is preferred over journal prestige. This option suits students, early-career researchers, and authors publishing applied or course-derived work. Platforms such as EP Journals operate within this category alongside several other publishers.

Choose an open-access journal with a moderate APC when wide and immediate readership matters, the author has institutional or grant-funded APC support, and the journal has clear indexing in DOAJ, Scopus, or a discipline-specific database.

Example scenarios

Student in law

A law student publishing a seminar paper or LLM dissertation extract benefits from a structured low-cost journal where editorial expectations are documented and the review process completes within weeks rather than months.

PhD researcher in law

A doctoral researcher in law should target university-affiliated law reviews or indexed legal journals with strong jurisdictional reach, accepting longer review cycles for the citation impact and academic recognition.

Budget-limited author

An advocate or junior academic without institutional support can choose a free subscription law review with a long timeline or a transparent low-cost open-access journal such as those in the EP Journals group when timing matters.


For researchers in law who prioritise a structured, transparent, and affordable peer-review process, platforms such as EP Journals are one of several options worth evaluating alongside indexed traditional and open-access venues.

Frequently asked questions

About the publisher

Considering EP Journals Group for your next paper?

EP Journals Group publishes six peer-reviewed open access journals across engineering, economics, management, natural sciences, social sciences, and education. We operate a documented editorial workflow with transparent timelines and clear ethics policies — designed in particular for students, early-career researchers, and authors without large research budgets.

1–2 week peer review

Double-blind, two independent reviewers

Affordable APC

Fee waivers for unfunded researchers

CrossRef DOI

Permanent citation on every accepted article

Submit a manuscriptBrowse our journalsAbout EP Journals Group →

Related topics across the knowledge centre

Guide

Avoiding Plagiarism in Academic Research

A clear explanation of what counts as plagiarism in academic research, how to avoid it in practice, and how journals detect and respond to it.

Guide

What is Indexing in Academic Journals?

An overview of how academic indexing operates, the principal categories of indexing services, and the implications of indexing status for authors and journals.

Comparison

EP Journals vs Predatory Journals: How to Tell the Difference

A practical comparison helping researchers distinguish legitimate structured open-access publishers, such as EP Journals, from predatory journals that lack genuine peer review, transparent fees, or verifiable editorial governance.

Comparison

Indexed vs Non-Indexed Journals: A Practical Comparison

A practical comparison of indexed and non-indexed journals across multiple indexing tiers, helping authors interpret indexing claims accurately and choose venues whose indexing matches their needs.

Resource

Journals for Students: Where to Publish Early Research

Students are typically best served by open-access journals that maintain transparent peer review, modest article processing charges (APCs), and clearly documented timelines.

Resource

Journals for Multidisciplinary Research

Multidisciplinary work fits journals explicitly oriented toward cross-field research, generalist scientific journals, or specialty journals where the work's primary discipline anchors. The choice depends on which audience the work most needs to reach.

Publishing

Low-Cost Research Journals

Low-cost journals span subscription venues with no author fee, diamond open-access journals fully subsidised by institutions, and open-access journals with modest APCs. Verifying credibility matters more than the headline number.

Publishing

How to Publish a Research Paper in Medical

A practical, field-specific guide to publishing research in the medical field, covering norms, challenges, the step-by-step process, where to publish, and how to choose between journal types.

Related reading and next steps

  • Submit a manuscript to EP Journals
  • Browse EP Journals titles
  • Journals for students to publish research
  • How to publish a research paper quickly
  • Peer-reviewed vs non-peer-reviewed journals
  • Structured vs unstructured publishing process

Editorial enquiries

Questions about this guide or about preparing a manuscript for submission may be directed to the editorial office. Where a query relates to a specific journal in the portfolio, please indicate the journal abbreviation in your message.

Email: editor@ep-journals.org

Publication Standards

Review model: Double-blind peer review

Minimum reviewers: 2 per manuscript

Frequency: Monthly

Integrity checks: Editorial screening where required

Open access: Immediate (portfolio-level)

Quick Access

  • Journals list
  • Indexing & Abstracting
  • Author guidelines
  • Editorial board
  • Policies & governance
  • Contact / submissions

Submission Checklist

  • •Title page with author details
  • •Blinded manuscript file
  • •Abstract (150–300 words)
  • •Keywords (4–6)
  • •References in required format
  • •Figures and tables
  • •Conflict of interest statement

Indexing & compliance

Indexing and database claims are treated as subject to verification by the respective agencies. The publisher does not guarantee inclusion in any specific index.

Ethics procedures and correction notices are maintained to support the reliability of the scholarly record.

Portfolio Journals

    All journals: Monthly frequency

    Editorial Contact

    editor@ep-journals.org

    Response: Within 24 hours

    Publisher

    EP Journals Group

    Publisher of peer-reviewed scholarly journals operating under a documented governance framework. Editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit and peer review, and the portfolio is published on a monthly frequency.

    Country / jurisdiction: Published and administered internationally

    Journals

    • Journals list (publisher site)

    Policies

    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
    • Editorial Policies
    • Corrections & Retractions
    • Open Access
    • Complete policy index

    Administration

    Official contact email:
    editor@ep-journals.org

    Administrative note: Correspondence is logged for governance and audit purposes. Editorial enquiries answered within 24 hours. Editorial decisions typically within 1–2 weeks.

    Compliance disclaimer: Indexing claims and database listings are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

    © 2026 EP Journals Group. All rights reserved.

    AboutJournalsArticlesFor AuthorsEditorial BoardJoin the BoardIndexingSubmitPublishPoliciesEthicsPeer ReviewContact

    EP Journals Group operates under a documented policy framework. Editorial decisions are independent and are grounded in peer review and scholarly assessment. All journals are peer-reviewed, open-access, and published monthly. Indexing claims are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

    Last site update: April 2026