EP Journals Group logo
EP Journals GroupAcademic Publishing Organisation
Submit Paper
HomeAboutJournalsArticlesIndexingAuthor GuidelinesPublication ProcessEditorial BoardPoliciesContact

Knowledge Centre · Guide

Research Methodology Basics

An introduction to methodological choices in academic research and how to report them

Last updated: April 2026 · 8 min read · Audience: Authors, students, early-career researchers · Reading level: Introductory

This guide is part of the Knowledge Centre maintained by EP Journals Group, an open access publisher of six peer-reviewed academic journals covering engineering and technology, economics and finance, management, natural sciences, social sciences, and education and finance. All journals operate under documented double-blind peer review with two independent reviewers, assign CrossRef DOIs on acceptance, and publish under a CC BY 4.0 licence.
Quick answer. A methodology section answers four questions: what approach was used (quantitative, qualitative, mixed, theoretical), why this approach fits the question, what specific procedure was followed, and what limitations the approach implies. Reviewers evaluate methodology more than any other section.

Introduction

Methodology is the structured approach a study takes to its research question. It includes the broad approach (quantitative, qualitative, etc.) and the specific procedures (sampling, measurement, analysis). Both must be explicit in the manuscript; reviewers judge methodology rigour throughout the paper.

This page introduces the basics. Specific methods (regression, thematic analysis, structural equation modelling) are covered in field-specific sources; the focus here is on the cross-cutting principles.

Major methodological approaches

ApproachWhat it doesWhen it fits
QuantitativeMeasures, tests, generalisesHypothesis-testing; numerical relationships
QualitativeDescribes, interprets, theorisesMeaning-making; complex social phenomena
Mixed methodsCombines bothQuestions requiring breadth and depth
Theoretical / conceptualDevelops or critiques frameworksConceptual rather than empirical questions
Applied / case-basedStudies specific instances in detailPractice-relevant questions

Practical guidance

  • State the methodological approach explicitly in the methodology section's first paragraph.
  • Justify the approach: why this method, and not the alternative? Reviewers expect the choice to be defended.
  • Report procedures with enough detail that a reader could replicate the work.
  • Disclose limitations of the chosen approach; methodology that pretends to have no limitations is suspicious.
  • Match analysis to data type. Quantitative analysis on inappropriate data is commonly flagged.

Common methodology mistakes

The most common mistake is choosing methodology by familiarity rather than fit. Authors use the methodology they know rather than the one the question requires. Reviewers identify the mismatch and consistently flag it. Selecting methodology should be driven by the question, not by the author's training.

Other recurring issues: insufficient procedural detail, missing justification for choices, mismatch between data type and analysis, and absent discussion of limitations.

Decision guidance

If unsure about methodology choice, ask: what kind of question is this? Questions about how widespread or how strong are typically quantitative; questions about how or why are typically qualitative; questions about whether are typically experimental. Methodology should follow from the question.

Example scenarios

Scenario: a master's student selecting methodology for a first project

First-time researchers often default to the methodology used in their courses. The better starting point is the research question: read recent papers addressing similar questions and note which methodologies they use. Methodology selection should be a deliberate choice, not a default.

Scenario: a PhD researcher reporting mixed methods

Mixed-methods studies require justification for the combination. A common reviewer concern is that the methods are reported separately without integration. Strong mixed-methods papers explain how the qualitative and quantitative components inform each other; weak ones describe two unrelated studies in one paper.

Scenario: an applied researcher studying a single case

Single-case studies are valid when the case is theoretically significant or instrumental. The methodology section should explain why this case was selected, what makes it theoretically interesting, and what generalisations are (and are not) appropriate. Reviewers concerned about generalisability are addressing a real point; addressing it preemptively in the methodology strengthens the paper.

What to do next

If the methodology is selected and reported, the next step is verification: read the methodology asking whether a reader could replicate the work and whether limitations are honestly stated. Authors targeting EP Journals Group venues can use the central submission form.

Frequently asked questions

About the publisher

Considering EP Journals Group for your next paper?

EP Journals Group publishes six peer-reviewed open access journals across engineering, economics, management, natural sciences, social sciences, and education. We operate a documented editorial workflow with transparent timelines and clear ethics policies — designed in particular for students, early-career researchers, and authors without large research budgets.

1–2 week peer review

Double-blind, two independent reviewers

Affordable APC

Fee waivers for unfunded researchers

CrossRef DOI

Permanent citation on every accepted article

Submit a manuscriptBrowse our journalsAbout EP Journals Group →

Related topics across the knowledge centre

Comparison

EP Journals vs Predatory Journals: How to Tell the Difference

A practical comparison helping researchers distinguish legitimate structured open-access publishers, such as EP Journals, from predatory journals that lack genuine peer review, transparent fees, or verifiable editorial governance.

Comparison

Indexed vs Non-Indexed Journals: A Practical Comparison

A practical comparison of indexed and non-indexed journals across multiple indexing tiers, helping authors interpret indexing claims accurately and choose venues whose indexing matches their needs.

Publishing

Low-Cost Research Journals

Low-cost journals span subscription venues with no author fee, diamond open-access journals fully subsidised by institutions, and open-access journals with modest APCs. Verifying credibility matters more than the headline number.

Publishing

How to Publish a Research Paper in Law

A practical, field-specific guide to publishing research in law, covering norms, challenges, the step-by-step process, where to publish, and how to choose between journal types.

Resource

Journals for Students: Where to Publish Early Research

Students are typically best served by open-access journals that maintain transparent peer review, modest article processing charges (APCs), and clearly documented timelines.

Resource

Journals for Multidisciplinary Research

Multidisciplinary work fits journals explicitly oriented toward cross-field research, generalist scientific journals, or specialty journals where the work's primary discipline anchors. The choice depends on which audience the work most needs to reach.

Guide

Avoiding Plagiarism in Academic Research

A clear explanation of what counts as plagiarism in academic research, how to avoid it in practice, and how journals detect and respond to it.

Guide

What is Indexing in Academic Journals?

An overview of how academic indexing operates, the principal categories of indexing services, and the implications of indexing status for authors and journals.

Related reading and next steps

  • Submission portal — Submit a manuscript through the central form
  • Journals list — Six peer-reviewed journals across disciplines
  • Writing a research paper step by step
  • How to choose a research topic
  • Structured vs unstructured
  • Publishing in data science

Editorial enquiries

Questions about this guide or about preparing a manuscript for submission may be directed to the editorial office. Where a query relates to a specific journal in the portfolio, please indicate the journal abbreviation in your message.

Email: editor@ep-journals.org

Publication Standards

Review model: Double-blind peer review

Minimum reviewers: 2 per manuscript

Frequency: Monthly

Integrity checks: Editorial screening where required

Open access: Immediate (portfolio-level)

Quick Access

  • Journals list
  • Indexing & Abstracting
  • Author guidelines
  • Editorial board
  • Policies & governance
  • Contact / submissions

Submission Checklist

  • •Title page with author details
  • •Blinded manuscript file
  • •Abstract (150–300 words)
  • •Keywords (4–6)
  • •References in required format
  • •Figures and tables
  • •Conflict of interest statement

Indexing & compliance

Indexing and database claims are treated as subject to verification by the respective agencies. The publisher does not guarantee inclusion in any specific index.

Ethics procedures and correction notices are maintained to support the reliability of the scholarly record.

Portfolio Journals

    All journals: Monthly frequency

    Editorial Contact

    editor@ep-journals.org

    Response: Within 24 hours

    Publisher

    EP Journals Group

    Publisher of peer-reviewed scholarly journals operating under a documented governance framework. Editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit and peer review, and the portfolio is published on a monthly frequency.

    Country / jurisdiction: Published and administered internationally

    Journals

    • Journals list (publisher site)

    Policies

    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
    • Editorial Policies
    • Corrections & Retractions
    • Open Access
    • Complete policy index

    Administration

    Official contact email:
    editor@ep-journals.org

    Administrative note: Correspondence is logged for governance and audit purposes. Editorial enquiries answered within 24 hours. Editorial decisions typically within 1–2 weeks.

    Compliance disclaimer: Indexing claims and database listings are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

    © 2026 EP Journals Group. All rights reserved.

    AboutJournalsArticlesFor AuthorsEditorial BoardJoin the BoardIndexingSubmitPublishPoliciesEthicsPeer ReviewContact

    EP Journals Group operates under a documented policy framework. Editorial decisions are independent and are grounded in peer review and scholarly assessment. All journals are peer-reviewed, open-access, and published monthly. Indexing claims are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

    Last site update: April 2026