EP Journals Group logo
EP Journals GroupAcademic Publishing Organisation
Submit Paper
HomeAboutJournalsArticlesIndexingAuthor GuidelinesPublication ProcessEditorial BoardPoliciesContact

Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies (JSSHRS) · Research article · Open access

The Hypocrisy View in Puritan Society and Its Relationship with Adultery Punishment in Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter

Ahmed Rasheed Majeed

9 May 2026 · Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp. 549-552

DOI: 10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-06

Download full text (PDF)Cite this article

What is this article about?

The Scarlet Letter, published in (1850) by Nathaniel Hawthorne, represents a harsh criticism of the Puritan society in the seventeenth century. It does so by unveiling the hypocrisy hidden beneath strict religious moral standards.

Article at a glance

Journal
Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies (JSSHRS)
Published
9 May 2026
Volume / issue / pages
Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp. 549-552
ISSN
3051-3561 (online) · 3051-3553 (print)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 — free to read and reuse with attribution
Peer review
Double-blind, at least two independent reviewers
Publisher
EP Journals Group

Abstract

The Scarlet Letter, published in (1850) by Nathaniel Hawthorne, represents a harsh criticism of the Puritan society in the seventeenth century. It does so by unveiling the hypocrisy hidden beneath strict religious moral standards. Hawthorne discloses the paradox between people’s appearance of possessing moral and religious values, and their inner moral corruption. This contradiction becomes evident in public condemnation towards Hester, and the guilt concealed by Dimmesdale. In this study, the researcher attempts to explore the way Puritan authority maintains over people through the use of accusations and punishments of adultery. The study focuses on the analysis of symbolism, characterization, public punishment, and narrative irony, arguing that Hawthorne presents moral punishment as a social performance, rather than a genuine spiritual redemption. In the end, the novel depicts Puritan social judgement as hypocritical, gendered, ultimately aimed at social control not pursuing true ethics.

Keywords: Hypocrisy, Puritanism, Gendered punishment, Social control, Moral judgment, Shame

Cite this article

APA
Ahmed Rasheed Majeed (2026). The Hypocrisy View in Puritan Society and Its Relationship with Adultery Punishment in Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(5), 549-552. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-06
BibTeX
@article{Ahmed2026,
  title   = {The Hypocrisy View in Puritan Society and Its Relationship with Adultery Punishment in Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter},
  author  = {Ahmed Rasheed Majeed},
  journal = {Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies},
  year    = {2026},
  volume  = {2},
  number  = {5},
  pages   = {549-552},
  doi     = {10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-06},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-06}
}

Questions about this article

Who wrote this article?

Ahmed Rasheed Majeed.

Where and when was it published?

In Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, Volume 2, Issue 5, pages 549-552, published by EP Journals Group on 9 May 2026.

Is this article free to read?

Yes. It is open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) licence, so anyone can read, share and reuse it with attribution.

What is the DOI of this article?

10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-06 (https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-06).

How do I cite this article?

APA: Ahmed Rasheed Majeed (2026). The Hypocrisy View in Puritan Society and Its Relationship with Adultery Punishment in Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(5), 549-552. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-06

More research from JSSHRS

  • From Project-Like Activities to Project-Based Learning: Identifying PBL Characteristics in Event Management Courses at Ho Chi Minh City University of Culture

    Huynh Cong Duan, Vu Thi Bich Duyen · Oct 2026

  • Revisiting the Uncanny Valley in the AI Era: A Review of Visual Artifacts and Aesthetic Perceptions in AI-Generated Characters

    Muhan Li · Oct 2026

  • Development of Students’ Self-Learning Competence in Teaching Political Theory Subjects in the Digital Environment

    Vu Thi Ha · Oct 2026

  • The Double-Edged Sword of Digital Transformation in Cultural Scenic Areas: Heterogeneous Moderation of Qilu Cultural Genes on Technology-Value Conversion Paths

    Xu Lulu, Tara Ahmed Mohammed · Oct 2026

  • Experience in Applying Active Learning Methods in Probability and Statistics at Gia Lai Medical College

    Nguyen Nhu Tram · Oct 2026

← All articlesAbout JSSHRS and how to submit

Publisher

EP Journals Group

Publisher of peer-reviewed scholarly journals operating under a documented governance framework. Editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit and peer review, and the portfolio is published on a monthly frequency.

Country / jurisdiction: Published and administered internationally

Journals

  • Journals list (publisher site)

Policies

  • Publication Ethics
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Policies
  • Corrections & Retractions
  • Open Access
  • Complete policy index

Administration

Official contact email:
editor@ep-journals.org

Administrative note: Correspondence is logged for governance and audit purposes. Editorial enquiries answered within 24 hours. Editorial decisions typically within 1–2 weeks.

Compliance disclaimer: Indexing claims and database listings are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

© 2026 EP Journals Group. All rights reserved.

AboutJournalsArticlesFor AuthorsTemplatesEditorial BoardJoin the BoardIndexingFAQSubmitPublishPoliciesEthicsPeer ReviewContact

EP Journals Group operates under a documented policy framework. Editorial decisions are independent and are grounded in peer review and scholarly assessment. All journals are peer-reviewed, open-access, and published monthly. Indexing claims are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

Last site update: April 2026