EP Journals Group logo
EP Journals GroupAcademic Publishing Organisation
Submit Paper
HomeAboutJournalsArticlesIndexingAuthor GuidelinesPublication ProcessEditorial BoardPoliciesContact

Journal of Management Research and Review (JMRR) · Research article · Open access

Project Management Gaps in Disaster Recovery: A Common Operating Picture Framework for Recovery Governance

SK Monirul Islam Mahadi

20 July 2026 · Vol. 2, Issue 7, pp. 507-514

DOI: 10.65150/EP-jmrr/V2E7/2026-05

Download full text (PDF)Cite this article

What is this article about?

Disaster recovery is often treated as a policy, funding, or reconstruction issue, yet it also functions as a complex project management environment involving uncertain scopes of work, multiple stakeholders, funding requirements, procurement controls, contractor coordination, infrastructure dependencies, risk escalation, and performance accountability. This article uses a qualitative document based conceptual analysis to examine project management gaps in disaster recovery and develop a Recovery Project Common Operating Picture (COP) Framework for recovery governance.

Article at a glance

Journal
Journal of Management Research and Review (JMRR)
Published
20 July 2026
Volume / issue / pages
Vol. 2, Issue 7, pp. 507-514
ISSN
3051-3588 (online) · 3051-357X (print)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 — free to read and reuse with attribution
Peer review
Double-blind, at least two independent reviewers
Publisher
EP Journals Group

Abstract

Disaster recovery is often treated as a policy, funding, or reconstruction issue, yet it also functions as a complex project management environment involving uncertain scopes of work, multiple stakeholders, funding requirements, procurement controls, contractor coordination, infrastructure dependencies, risk escalation, and performance accountability. This article uses a qualitative document based conceptual analysis to examine project management gaps in disaster recovery and develop a Recovery Project Common Operating Picture (COP) Framework for recovery governance. The analysis synthesizes disaster recovery doctrine, project management principles, public assistance and disaster recovery funding systems, infrastructure interdependency research, situational awareness theory, emergency information systems literature, and public sector oversight reports from the United States and Australia. The findings show that recovery delays are not caused only by disaster severity or funding limitations. They are also shaped by weak project visibility, fragmented stakeholder coordination, unclear responsibilities, delayed approvals, procurement bottlenecks, unmanaged dependencies, poor risk escalation, and limited performance monitoring. The article develops a nine-component framework that integrates scope definition, stakeholder responsibility mapping, schedule and milestone tracking, cost and funding visibility, procurement and contractor coordination, infrastructure dependency monitoring, risk and issue control, community impact tracking, and performance reporting. The article contributes to disaster recovery and project management scholarship by positioning the COP as a recovery governance and decision support mechanism that can strengthen shared visibility, accountability, coordination, and project performance in complex post-disaster environments.

Keywords: disaster recovery, project management, Common Operating Picture, qualitative document analysis, recovery governance, stakeholder coordination, infrastructure dependency, project performance, disaster risk management.

Cite this article

APA
SK Monirul Islam Mahadi (2026). Project Management Gaps in Disaster Recovery: A Common Operating Picture Framework for Recovery Governance. Journal of Management Research and Review, 2(7), 507-514. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jmrr/V2E7/2026-05
BibTeX
@article{SK2026,
  title   = {Project Management Gaps in Disaster Recovery: A Common Operating Picture Framework for Recovery Governance},
  author  = {SK Monirul Islam Mahadi},
  journal = {Journal of Management Research and Review},
  year    = {2026},
  volume  = {2},
  number  = {7},
  pages   = {507-514},
  doi     = {10.65150/EP-jmrr/V2E7/2026-05},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jmrr/V2E7/2026-05}
}

Questions about this article

Who wrote this article?

SK Monirul Islam Mahadi.

Where and when was it published?

In Journal of Management Research and Review, Volume 2, Issue 7, pages 507-514, published by EP Journals Group on 20 July 2026.

Is this article free to read?

Yes. It is open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) licence, so anyone can read, share and reuse it with attribution.

What is the DOI of this article?

10.65150/EP-jmrr/V2E7/2026-05 (https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jmrr/V2E7/2026-05).

How do I cite this article?

APA: SK Monirul Islam Mahadi (2026). Project Management Gaps in Disaster Recovery: A Common Operating Picture Framework for Recovery Governance. Journal of Management Research and Review, 2(7), 507-514. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jmrr/V2E7/2026-05

More research from JMRR

  • Responsible Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Design and Delivery of Higher Education Curricula in Vietnam

    Nguyễn Văn Thản · Oct 2026

  • From Open Educational Resources to an Open Learning Resource Ecosystem in the AI Era: Policy Implications for Vietnamese Higher Education

    Nguyễn Thị Tuyết · Oct 2026

  • University Lecturers’ Digital Competence and Training Quality in the Context of Generative Artificial Intelligence: An Integrative Review and Proposed Impact Framework

    Lý Bích Ngọc · Oct 2026

  • Challenges Analysis on Digitalization and Digital Platforms Adoption of Small Business Enterprises That Engaged in the Takeaway Industry—Evidence from Auckland

    Kassim M. Mohammed · Oct 2026

  • The Effect of Green Human Resource Management on Green Work Performance in Manufacturing Enterprises in Ho Chi Minh City

    Le Thi Cam Tu · Oct 2026

← All articlesAbout JMRR and how to submit

Publisher

EP Journals Group

Publisher of peer-reviewed scholarly journals operating under a documented governance framework. Editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit and peer review, and the portfolio is published on a monthly frequency.

Country / jurisdiction: Published and administered internationally

Journals

  • Journals list (publisher site)

Policies

  • Publication Ethics
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Policies
  • Corrections & Retractions
  • Open Access
  • Complete policy index

Administration

Official contact email:
editor@ep-journals.org

Administrative note: Correspondence is logged for governance and audit purposes. Editorial enquiries answered within 24 hours. Editorial decisions typically within 1–2 weeks.

Compliance disclaimer: Indexing claims and database listings are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

© 2026 EP Journals Group. All rights reserved.

AboutJournalsArticlesFor AuthorsTemplatesEditorial BoardJoin the BoardIndexingFAQSubmitPublishPoliciesEthicsPeer ReviewContact

EP Journals Group operates under a documented policy framework. Editorial decisions are independent and are grounded in peer review and scholarly assessment. All journals are peer-reviewed, open-access, and published monthly. Indexing claims are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

Last site update: April 2026