Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies (JSSHRS) · Research article · Open access

Post-Pandemic Mathematical Learning Recovery: A Narrative Review of Targeted Intervention Strategies in United States Secondary Education

Gabriel Acheampong, Adwoa Agyeiwaah Ampomah Britwum

28 July 2026 · Vol. 2, Issue 7, pp. 1363-1371

DOI: 10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E7/2026-41

Download full text (PDF)Cite this article

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic left the United States with the mathematics learning crisis of a generation, in which deficits in mathematics learning by secondary students corresponded to the loss of multiple months of learning, and were most severe for low-income, Black, Hispanic, and Native American students. These losses have since been well studied, but the recovery literature presents pedagogy, sociodemographic inequality, and data-driven monitoring as distinct fields, with an increasing number of ‘catch-up' programs each time, which are invariably weakened by the very structures that they did not consider. This narrative review presents a unifying thesis: mathematical recovery after the pandemic is a single coordination problem that can only be solved by working with the inequalities it aims to offset and the predictive processes for assessing its impact. The review begins by establishing the empirical scale and sociodemographic patterning of pandemic-era learning loss; it shows that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to catch-up that will equalize the harms that have been unevenly distributed. It then considers the current generation of pedagogical interventions (adaptive personalization, AI-enhanced platforms and small-group instructional models), and how their demonstrated advantages for lower-performing students are indistinguishable from access conditions that differentiate who gets which and who does not. Next, the review considers the structural filters that influence the effectiveness of interventions: socioeconomic status, racial inequality, and digital access, as they are not background factors, but rather critical factors shaping the chance of any pedagogical approach reaching the students it was designed to serve. The review then rates diagnostic assessment and predictive modeling, not as tools to be used in conjunction with instruction, but as coordinating tools that enable schools to determine who, in the aggregate, is underperforming and to focus interventions on these disparities while continually adjusting dosage. Lastly, the review identifies methodological gaps, the ethical dangers of algorithmic bias and data privacy, and the multi-level policy levers by which districts will need to coordinate integrated diagnostic-pedagogical architectures to support equitable continuity of recovery response, suggesting that a lack of consideration for equity in a way will be a lack of concern for how to improve teaching and learning.

Keywords: post-pandemic learning recovery, secondary mathematics education, adaptive learning, educational equity, artificial intelligence in education, small-group instruction, predictive modelling

Gabriel Acheampong, & Adwoa Agyeiwaah Ampomah Britwum (2026). Post-Pandemic Mathematical Learning Recovery: A Narrative Review of Targeted Intervention Strategies in United States Secondary Education. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(7), 1363-1371. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E7/2026-41

@article{Gabriel2026,
  title   = {Post-Pandemic Mathematical Learning Recovery: A Narrative Review of Targeted Intervention Strategies in United States Secondary Education},
  author  = {Gabriel Acheampong and Adwoa Agyeiwaah Ampomah Britwum},
  journal = {Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies},
  year    = {2026},
  volume  = {2},
  number  = {7},
  pages   = {1363-1371},
  doi     = {10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E7/2026-41},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E7/2026-41}
}

← All articlesAbout JSSHRS and how to submit