EP Journals Group logo
EP Journals GroupAcademic Publishing Organisation
Submit Paper
HomeAboutJournalsArticlesIndexingAuthor GuidelinesPublication ProcessEditorial BoardPoliciesContact

Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies (JSSHRS) · Research article · Open access

Male Scepticism, Female Advocacy: Gender Divergence in Family Planning Attitudes in Tarakwa Ward, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya

Boniface Kipkemboi Kosgey, Joseph K. Rono, Paul C. Sutter

27 August 2026 · Vol. 2, Issue 8, pp. 1597-1602

DOI: 10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-28

Download full text (PDF)Cite this article

What is this article about?

Background : Kenya has made measurable progress in expanding modern contraceptive coverage and lowering fertility, yet unmet need for family planning (FP) persists unevenly across counties, and rural areas continue to report gendered gaps in contraceptive attitudes and use. This study examined how gender shapes perceptions of, and receptivity to, family planning among men and women of reproductive age in Tarakwa Ward, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya.

Article at a glance

Journal
Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies (JSSHRS)
Published
27 August 2026
Volume / issue / pages
Vol. 2, Issue 8, pp. 1597-1602
ISSN
3051-3561 (online) · 3051-3553 (print)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 — free to read and reuse with attribution
Peer review
Double-blind, at least two independent reviewers
Publisher
EP Journals Group

Abstract

Background : Kenya has made measurable progress in expanding modern contraceptive coverage and lowering fertility, yet unmet need for family planning (FP) persists unevenly across counties, and rural areas continue to report gendered gaps in contraceptive attitudes and use. This study examined how gender shapes perceptions of, and receptivity to, family planning among men and women of reproductive age in Tarakwa Ward, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Methods: A qualitative, phenomenological and cross-sectional design was used. Thirty-five in-depth interviews were conducted with community members aged 18–49 years, alongside key informant interviews with healthcare providers, using purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were conducted in Swahili or English, audio-recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim, and analysed in NVivo 12 using Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-step thematic analysis. Findings were interpreted through Bandura's (1986, 1989) Social Cognitive Theory. Results: Attitudes toward FP diverged sharply by gender. Across 35 community-member interviews, 45.7% expressed active support for FP grounded in maternal health, birth spacing, and financial necessity; 14.3% explicitly framed FP as a “women's issue” from which men could reasonably remain distant; 20.0% expressed male scepticism linked to circulating myths about infertility, diminished virility, and infidelity; and 17.1% described stigma against unmarried FP users as a compounding barrier. Within these themes, individual accounts diverged sharply in content and register by gender: women consistently framed FP in terms of health and economic necessity, while men's accounts more often invoked misinformation, moral concern, or a perceived threat to marital authority. Healthcare providers corroborated these patterns, describing men as largely absent from FP counselling and outreach, and identifying male non-attendance itself as a driver of continued misinformation. Conclusions: Gender divergence in FP attitudes in Tarakwa Ward reflects socially modelled and reciprocally reinforced roles, consistent with Social Cognitive Theory, rather than differences in knowledge alone. Closing this divergence requires deliberate, male-inclusive engagement strategies that address misinformation directly rather than programming that continues to treat women as the sole audience for FP communication.

Keywords: family planning, gender perceptions, male scepticism, Social Cognitive Theory, sub-Saharan Africa, qualitative research

Cite this article

APA
Boniface Kipkemboi Kosgey, Joseph K. Rono, & Paul C. Sutter (2026). Male Scepticism, Female Advocacy: Gender Divergence in Family Planning Attitudes in Tarakwa Ward, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(8), 1597-1602. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-28
BibTeX
@article{Boniface2026,
  title   = {Male Scepticism, Female Advocacy: Gender Divergence in Family Planning Attitudes in Tarakwa Ward, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya},
  author  = {Boniface Kipkemboi Kosgey and Joseph K. Rono and Paul C. Sutter},
  journal = {Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies},
  year    = {2026},
  volume  = {2},
  number  = {8},
  pages   = {1597-1602},
  doi     = {10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-28},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-28}
}

Questions about this article

Who wrote this article?

Boniface Kipkemboi Kosgey, Joseph K. Rono, Paul C. Sutter.

Where and when was it published?

In Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, Volume 2, Issue 8, pages 1597-1602, published by EP Journals Group on 27 August 2026.

Is this article free to read?

Yes. It is open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) licence, so anyone can read, share and reuse it with attribution.

What is the DOI of this article?

10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-28 (https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-28).

How do I cite this article?

APA: Boniface Kipkemboi Kosgey, Joseph K. Rono, & Paul C. Sutter (2026). Male Scepticism, Female Advocacy: Gender Divergence in Family Planning Attitudes in Tarakwa Ward, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(8), 1597-1602. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-28

More research from JSSHRS

  • From Project-Like Activities to Project-Based Learning: Identifying PBL Characteristics in Event Management Courses at Ho Chi Minh City University of Culture

    Huynh Cong Duan, Vu Thi Bich Duyen · Oct 2026

  • Revisiting the Uncanny Valley in the AI Era: A Review of Visual Artifacts and Aesthetic Perceptions in AI-Generated Characters

    Muhan Li · Oct 2026

  • Development of Students’ Self-Learning Competence in Teaching Political Theory Subjects in the Digital Environment

    Vu Thi Ha · Oct 2026

  • The Double-Edged Sword of Digital Transformation in Cultural Scenic Areas: Heterogeneous Moderation of Qilu Cultural Genes on Technology-Value Conversion Paths

    Xu Lulu, Tara Ahmed Mohammed · Oct 2026

  • Experience in Applying Active Learning Methods in Probability and Statistics at Gia Lai Medical College

    Nguyen Nhu Tram · Oct 2026

← All articlesAbout JSSHRS and how to submit

Publisher

EP Journals Group

Publisher of peer-reviewed scholarly journals operating under a documented governance framework. Editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit and peer review, and the portfolio is published on a monthly frequency.

Country / jurisdiction: Published and administered internationally

Journals

  • Journals list (publisher site)

Policies

  • Publication Ethics
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Policies
  • Corrections & Retractions
  • Open Access
  • Complete policy index

Administration

Official contact email:
editor@ep-journals.org

Administrative note: Correspondence is logged for governance and audit purposes. Editorial enquiries answered within 24 hours. Editorial decisions typically within 1–2 weeks.

Compliance disclaimer: Indexing claims and database listings are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

© 2026 EP Journals Group. All rights reserved.

AboutJournalsArticlesFor AuthorsTemplatesEditorial BoardJoin the BoardIndexingFAQSubmitPublishPoliciesEthicsPeer ReviewContact

EP Journals Group operates under a documented policy framework. Editorial decisions are independent and are grounded in peer review and scholarly assessment. All journals are peer-reviewed, open-access, and published monthly. Indexing claims are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

Last site update: April 2026