EP Journals Group logo
EP Journals GroupAcademic Publishing Organisation
Submit Paper
HomeAboutJournalsArticlesIndexingAuthor GuidelinesPublication ProcessEditorial BoardPoliciesContact

Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies (JSSHRS) · Research article · Open access

Institutional Integrity and Whistleblowing Architecture in Corruption Prevention: A Systematic Literature Review

Eka Sudarmaji

9 May 2026 · Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp. 553-559

DOI: 10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-07

Download full text (PDF)Cite this article

What is this article about?

This systematic literature review examines the relationship between institutional integrity frameworks and whistleblowing architecture as mechanisms for corruption prevention. Drawing on 1,818 deduplicated studies identified across Google Scholar and Crossref, with a primary analytical focus on 1,296 papers published between 2016 and 2026, the review follows the PRISMA protocol to synthesize evidence on how reporting systems and organizational ethics interact to either sustain or suppress corrupt practices.

Article at a glance

Journal
Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies (JSSHRS)
Published
9 May 2026
Volume / issue / pages
Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp. 553-559
ISSN
3051-3561 (online) · 3051-3553 (print)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 — free to read and reuse with attribution
Peer review
Double-blind, at least two independent reviewers
Publisher
EP Journals Group

Abstract

This systematic literature review examines the relationship between institutional integrity frameworks and whistleblowing architecture as mechanisms for corruption prevention. Drawing on 1,818 deduplicated studies identified across Google Scholar and Crossref, with a primary analytical focus on 1,296 papers published between 2016 and 2026, the review follows the PRISMA protocol to synthesize evidence on how reporting systems and organizational ethics interact to either sustain or suppress corrupt practices. The review finds that whistleblowing remains critically underutilized: despite growing legal protections under international frameworks such as the UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), fear of retaliation and weak organizational trust continue to suppress disclosure rates across public and private sectors. Three dominant thematic clusters emerge from the literature — the psychology of reporting behavior, the design of institutional reporting mechanisms, and the harmonization of global regulatory standards — each illuminating a distinct gap between policy intention and operational reality. The review concludes that effective corruption prevention depends not on legal instruments alone, but on a dynamic alignment between structural oversight mechanisms, leadership accountability, and a genuine organizational culture of transparency. For policymakers and institutional leaders, the findings suggest that investing in psychological safety and independent oversight channels produces measurably better outcomes than compliance-driven reporting mandates. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies that track whistleblowing outcomes across institutional reform cycles.

Keywords: institutional integrity, whistleblowing, corruption prevention, systematic literature review, anti-corruption governance, public sector ethics

Cite this article

APA
Eka Sudarmaji (2026). Institutional Integrity and Whistleblowing Architecture in Corruption Prevention: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(5), 553-559. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-07
BibTeX
@article{Eka2026,
  title   = {Institutional Integrity and Whistleblowing Architecture in Corruption Prevention: A Systematic Literature Review},
  author  = {Eka Sudarmaji},
  journal = {Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies},
  year    = {2026},
  volume  = {2},
  number  = {5},
  pages   = {553-559},
  doi     = {10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-07},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-07}
}

Questions about this article

Who wrote this article?

Eka Sudarmaji.

Where and when was it published?

In Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, Volume 2, Issue 5, pages 553-559, published by EP Journals Group on 9 May 2026.

Is this article free to read?

Yes. It is open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) licence, so anyone can read, share and reuse it with attribution.

What is the DOI of this article?

10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-07 (https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-07).

How do I cite this article?

APA: Eka Sudarmaji (2026). Institutional Integrity and Whistleblowing Architecture in Corruption Prevention: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(5), 553-559. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-07

More research from JSSHRS

  • From Project-Like Activities to Project-Based Learning: Identifying PBL Characteristics in Event Management Courses at Ho Chi Minh City University of Culture

    Huynh Cong Duan, Vu Thi Bich Duyen · Oct 2026

  • Revisiting the Uncanny Valley in the AI Era: A Review of Visual Artifacts and Aesthetic Perceptions in AI-Generated Characters

    Muhan Li · Oct 2026

  • Development of Students’ Self-Learning Competence in Teaching Political Theory Subjects in the Digital Environment

    Vu Thi Ha · Oct 2026

  • The Double-Edged Sword of Digital Transformation in Cultural Scenic Areas: Heterogeneous Moderation of Qilu Cultural Genes on Technology-Value Conversion Paths

    Xu Lulu, Tara Ahmed Mohammed · Oct 2026

  • Experience in Applying Active Learning Methods in Probability and Statistics at Gia Lai Medical College

    Nguyen Nhu Tram · Oct 2026

← All articlesAbout JSSHRS and how to submit

Publisher

EP Journals Group

Publisher of peer-reviewed scholarly journals operating under a documented governance framework. Editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit and peer review, and the portfolio is published on a monthly frequency.

Country / jurisdiction: Published and administered internationally

Journals

  • Journals list (publisher site)

Policies

  • Publication Ethics
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Policies
  • Corrections & Retractions
  • Open Access
  • Complete policy index

Administration

Official contact email:
editor@ep-journals.org

Administrative note: Correspondence is logged for governance and audit purposes. Editorial enquiries answered within 24 hours. Editorial decisions typically within 1–2 weeks.

Compliance disclaimer: Indexing claims and database listings are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

© 2026 EP Journals Group. All rights reserved.

AboutJournalsArticlesFor AuthorsTemplatesEditorial BoardJoin the BoardIndexingFAQSubmitPublishPoliciesEthicsPeer ReviewContact

EP Journals Group operates under a documented policy framework. Editorial decisions are independent and are grounded in peer review and scholarly assessment. All journals are peer-reviewed, open-access, and published monthly. Indexing claims are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

Last site update: April 2026