Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies (JSSHRS) · Research article · Open access
Governing in the Name of the People: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Populist Party Behaviour in Coalition Executives
Tomilayo O. M Aroyehun
30 April 2026 · Vol. 2, Issue 4, pp. 487-491
DOI: 10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E4/2026-23
Download full text (PDF)Cite this article
What is this article about?
This study examines how populist parties adapt their political behaviour when transitioning from anti-establishment opposition to governing responsibility in coalition executives. It investigates whether populist parties moderate their rhetorical and behavioural repertoire upon entering office, and how the institutional constraints of coalition governance shape their performative strategies.
Article at a glance
- Published
- 30 April 2026
- Volume / issue / pages
- Vol. 2, Issue 4, pp. 487-491
- ISSN
- 3051-3561 (online) · 3051-3553 (print)
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0 — free to read and reuse with attribution
- Peer review
- Double-blind, at least two independent reviewers
- Publisher
- EP Journals Group
Abstract
This study examines how populist parties adapt their political behaviour when transitioning from anti-establishment opposition to governing responsibility in coalition executives. It investigates whether populist parties moderate their rhetorical and behavioural repertoire upon entering office, and how the institutional constraints of coalition governance shape their performative strategies. A qualitative comparative case-study design was employed, drawing exclusively on secondary documentary sources. The analysis examines two coalition governments involving populist parties: the Austrian ÖVP–FPÖ coalition (2017–2019) and the Italian Lega–M5S coalition (2018–2019). Data comprise official parliamentary transcripts, coalition agreements, government policy programmes, ministerial press releases, and existing qualitative case-study literature. Documentary materials were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify patterns of behavioural continuity and adaptation. The analysis reveals that populist parties do not uniformly abandon their anti-establishment behavioural repertoire upon entering government. Rather, they engage in selective behavioural moderation: diluting confrontational rhetoric in policy-implementation domains while intensifying performative anti-elite symbolism in communicative arenas. Coalition agreements function as behavioural scripts that constrain ministerial action but simultaneously provide discursive resources for sustaining populist identity. Cross-case comparison indicates that behavioural adaptation is mediated by party organisational structure and senior partners tolerance for populist performativity. The study advances political behaviour scholarship by demonstrating that populist governing behaviour is neither fully constrained by institutional responsibility nor immune to contextual pressure. Findings carry implications for coalition theory, democratic accountability, and the comparative study of executive behaviour in fragmented party systems.
Keywords: populist parties, coalition government, political behaviour, executive politics, qualitative documentary analysis, comparative case study, Austria, Italy
Cite this article
Tomilayo O. M Aroyehun (2026). Governing in the Name of the People: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Populist Party Behaviour in Coalition Executives. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(4), 487-491. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E4/2026-23
@article{Tomilayo2026,
title = {Governing in the Name of the People: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Populist Party Behaviour in Coalition Executives},
author = {Tomilayo O. M Aroyehun},
journal = {Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies},
year = {2026},
volume = {2},
number = {4},
pages = {487-491},
doi = {10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E4/2026-23},
url = {https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E4/2026-23}
}Questions about this article
Who wrote this article?
Tomilayo O. M Aroyehun.
Where and when was it published?
In Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, Volume 2, Issue 4, pages 487-491, published by EP Journals Group on 30 April 2026.
Is this article free to read?
Yes. It is open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) licence, so anyone can read, share and reuse it with attribution.
What is the DOI of this article?
10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E4/2026-23 (https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E4/2026-23).
How do I cite this article?
APA: Tomilayo O. M Aroyehun (2026). Governing in the Name of the People: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Populist Party Behaviour in Coalition Executives. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(4), 487-491. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E4/2026-23
More research from JSSHRS
- From Project-Like Activities to Project-Based Learning: Identifying PBL Characteristics in Event Management Courses at Ho Chi Minh City University of Culture
Huynh Cong Duan, Vu Thi Bich Duyen · Oct 2026
- Revisiting the Uncanny Valley in the AI Era: A Review of Visual Artifacts and Aesthetic Perceptions in AI-Generated Characters
Muhan Li · Oct 2026
- Development of Students’ Self-Learning Competence in Teaching Political Theory Subjects in the Digital Environment
Vu Thi Ha · Oct 2026
- The Double-Edged Sword of Digital Transformation in Cultural Scenic Areas: Heterogeneous Moderation of Qilu Cultural Genes on Technology-Value Conversion Paths
Xu Lulu, Tara Ahmed Mohammed · Oct 2026
- Experience in Applying Active Learning Methods in Probability and Statistics at Gia Lai Medical College
Nguyen Nhu Tram · Oct 2026