EP Journals Group logo
EP Journals GroupAcademic Publishing Organisation
Submit Paper
HomeAboutJournalsArticlesIndexingAuthor GuidelinesPublication ProcessEditorial BoardPoliciesContact

Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies (JSSHRS) · Research article · Open access

From Scholarly Communication Support to the Transformation of Library Research Support Services: A Bibliometric Analysis and Scoping Review

Nhat Phan Truong

22 August 2026 · Vol. 2, Issue 8, pp. 1526-1538

DOI: 10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-17

Download full text (PDF)Cite this article

What is this article about?

Purpose – This study aims to examine the transformation of university library research support services from scholarly communication support to integrated research support services within the context of open science. By combining bibliometric analysis with a scoping review, the study explores the intellectual evolution of the field, identifies major research trends and thematic developments, synthesizes emerging service models and institutional practices, and examines the drivers, barriers, and competencies associated with this transformation.

Article at a glance

Journal
Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies (JSSHRS)
Published
22 August 2026
Volume / issue / pages
Vol. 2, Issue 8, pp. 1526-1538
ISSN
3051-3561 (online) · 3051-3553 (print)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 — free to read and reuse with attribution
Peer review
Double-blind, at least two independent reviewers
Publisher
EP Journals Group

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to examine the transformation of university library research support services from scholarly communication support to integrated research support services within the context of open science. By combining bibliometric analysis with a scoping review, the study explores the intellectual evolution of the field, identifies major research trends and thematic developments, synthesizes emerging service models and institutional practices, and examines the drivers, barriers, and competencies associated with this transformation. The findings provide a comprehensive understanding of how academic libraries are repositioning their roles and offer practical implications for developing sustainable, research-oriented support services in higher education. Design/methodology/approach – This study employed a bibliometric analysis combined with a scoping review using data retrieved from the Scopus database. An adapted PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework guided the identification of research trends and knowledge gaps. Bibliometric analyses were performed using the Bibliometrix/Biblioshiny package in R, while VOSviewer was used for network visualization. Furthermore, thematic qualitative content analysis was applied to the selected studies to synthesize research support service models, emerging practices, transformation pathways, and key developments in scholarly communication within the evolving open science and digital research ecosystem. Findings – The findings indicate that research on the transformation of research support services in relation to scholarly communication has expanded substantially during the period 2016-2026, reflecting a shift from traditional library services toward an open research ecosystem. Bibliometric analysis identified major research themes, including open access, open science, research data management, scholarly communication, and scholarly publishing. It revealed the growing prominence of AI, research visibility, and research impact assessment. The scoping review further demonstrates that scholarly communication has evolved beyond publication support to encompass the entire research lifecycle, driving the transformation of academic libraries from information providers to strategic research partners. Academic libraries are increasingly engaged in research data management, open access publishing, bibliometric services, research capacity building, and digital research infrastructure management. Nevertheless, this transformation continues to face challenges related to institutional policies, digital infrastructure, financial and human resources, professional competencies, and traditional research evaluation systems, highlighting the need for coordinated institutional, technological, and workforce development to establish sustainable open research ecosystems. Research limitations/implications – This study has several limitations. First, the analysis was limited to Scopus-indexed publications, potentially excluding relevant studies from other databases and grey literature. Second, the bibliometric findings reflect publication patterns rather than the effectiveness of research support services in practice. Despite these limitations, the study provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of scholarly communication support. It offers evidence to inform the development of research support services, professional competencies, and institutional Open Science strategies in academic libraries. Practical implications – This study contributes to the systematic integration of research domains that have traditionally been examined separately, including open access, open science, research data management, scholarly communication, and research support services, into a unified analytical framework based on the research ecosystem perspective. The findings not only clarify major developmental trends, areas of consensus, and ongoing debates within the field but also identify important research gaps that warrant further investigation, particularly regarding the evaluation of research support services' effectiveness, the emerging role of Artificial Intelligence and generative Artificial Intelligence (AI/GenAI), and cross-national differences in research support practices. Originality/value – This study is among the first to integrate bibliometric analysis with a scoping review to provide a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of research support services in academic libraries. It extends existing scholarship by conceptualizing research support services as an integrated research ecosystem rather than a collection of isolated scholarly communication activities. The study synthesizes evidence on the relationships among scholarly communication, open science, digital research infrastructure, research data management, and emerging technologies, offering a unified analytical framework for interpreting service transformation. The findings contribute to both theory and practice by informing future research, supporting strategic library planning, and guiding the development of sustainable research support services aligned with institutional research priorities and open science agendas.

Keywords: Scholarly communication, Research support services, Digital transformation, Open science, Academic libraries

Cite this article

APA
Nhat Phan Truong (2026). From Scholarly Communication Support to the Transformation of Library Research Support Services: A Bibliometric Analysis and Scoping Review. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(8), 1526-1538. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-17
BibTeX
@article{Nhat2026,
  title   = {From Scholarly Communication Support to the Transformation of Library Research Support Services: A Bibliometric Analysis and Scoping Review},
  author  = {Nhat Phan Truong},
  journal = {Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies},
  year    = {2026},
  volume  = {2},
  number  = {8},
  pages   = {1526-1538},
  doi     = {10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-17},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-17}
}

Questions about this article

Who wrote this article?

Nhat Phan Truong.

Where and when was it published?

In Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, Volume 2, Issue 8, pages 1526-1538, published by EP Journals Group on 22 August 2026.

Is this article free to read?

Yes. It is open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) licence, so anyone can read, share and reuse it with attribution.

What is the DOI of this article?

10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-17 (https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-17).

How do I cite this article?

APA: Nhat Phan Truong (2026). From Scholarly Communication Support to the Transformation of Library Research Support Services: A Bibliometric Analysis and Scoping Review. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(8), 1526-1538. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-17

More research from JSSHRS

  • From Project-Like Activities to Project-Based Learning: Identifying PBL Characteristics in Event Management Courses at Ho Chi Minh City University of Culture

    Huynh Cong Duan, Vu Thi Bich Duyen · Oct 2026

  • Revisiting the Uncanny Valley in the AI Era: A Review of Visual Artifacts and Aesthetic Perceptions in AI-Generated Characters

    Muhan Li · Oct 2026

  • Development of Students’ Self-Learning Competence in Teaching Political Theory Subjects in the Digital Environment

    Vu Thi Ha · Oct 2026

  • The Double-Edged Sword of Digital Transformation in Cultural Scenic Areas: Heterogeneous Moderation of Qilu Cultural Genes on Technology-Value Conversion Paths

    Xu Lulu, Tara Ahmed Mohammed · Oct 2026

  • Experience in Applying Active Learning Methods in Probability and Statistics at Gia Lai Medical College

    Nguyen Nhu Tram · Oct 2026

← All articlesAbout JSSHRS and how to submit

Publisher

EP Journals Group

Publisher of peer-reviewed scholarly journals operating under a documented governance framework. Editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit and peer review, and the portfolio is published on a monthly frequency.

Country / jurisdiction: Published and administered internationally

Journals

  • Journals list (publisher site)

Policies

  • Publication Ethics
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Policies
  • Corrections & Retractions
  • Open Access
  • Complete policy index

Administration

Official contact email:
editor@ep-journals.org

Administrative note: Correspondence is logged for governance and audit purposes. Editorial enquiries answered within 24 hours. Editorial decisions typically within 1–2 weeks.

Compliance disclaimer: Indexing claims and database listings are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

© 2026 EP Journals Group. All rights reserved.

AboutJournalsArticlesFor AuthorsTemplatesEditorial BoardJoin the BoardIndexingFAQSubmitPublishPoliciesEthicsPeer ReviewContact

EP Journals Group operates under a documented policy framework. Editorial decisions are independent and are grounded in peer review and scholarly assessment. All journals are peer-reviewed, open-access, and published monthly. Indexing claims are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

Last site update: April 2026