EP Journals Group logo
EP Journals GroupAcademic Publishing Organisation
Submit Paper
HomeAboutJournalsArticlesIndexingAuthor GuidelinesPublication ProcessEditorial BoardPoliciesContact

Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies (JSSHRS) · Research article · Open access

Comparative Analysis of the Perception of the Training Process by Coaches and Female Athletes in 3×3 Basketball

Mocrousov Elena, Tugui Olga

5 May 2026 · Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp. 523-528

DOI: 10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-03

Download full text (PDF)Cite this article

What is this article about?

The purpose of the present study was to identify and analyze differences in the perception of the training process between coaches and female athletes engaged in 3×3 basketball. The study involved 30 respondents, including 20 female athletes aged 18-23 and 10 coaches with experience in training teams in this game format.

Article at a glance

Journal
Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies (JSSHRS)
Published
5 May 2026
Volume / issue / pages
Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp. 523-528
ISSN
3051-3561 (online) · 3051-3553 (print)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 — free to read and reuse with attribution
Peer review
Double-blind, at least two independent reviewers
Publisher
EP Journals Group

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to identify and analyze differences in the perception of the training process between coaches and female athletes engaged in 3×3 basketball. The study involved 30 respondents, including 20 female athletes aged 18-23 and 10 coaches with experience in training teams in this game format. To collect empirical data, an author-designed questionnaire was used, consisting of 28 statements grouped into 7 thematic blocks: understanding of training goals, perception of training load, feedback, autonomy and decision-making, team interaction, psycho-emotional state, and the reflection of the specificity of 3×3 basketball in training. The results of the study revealed the presence of consistent differences in the evaluation of the training process between the two groups. Across all analyzed blocks, coaches demonstrated higher ratings compared to female athletes, with differences ranging from 0.66 to 1.10 points. The most significant discrepancies were identified in the areas of feedback and psycho-emotional state, indicating a mismatch between the organization of the training process and its perception by the athletes. In other blocks, the differences were less pronounced but systematic in nature. The smallest discrepancy was observed in the evaluation of team interaction. The obtained data indicate that the perception of the training process depends on the participant’s role and may influence its effectiveness. The results of the study emphasize the need to take into account female athletes’ subjective perceptions when designing and adjusting training programs, especially under the conditions of the high-intensity and dynamic nature of 3×3 basketball.

Keywords: 3×3 basketball, training process, perception, coaches, female athletes, psycho-emotional state, team interaction, comparative analysis.

Cite this article

APA
Mocrousov Elena, & Tugui Olga (2026). Comparative Analysis of the Perception of the Training Process by Coaches and Female Athletes in 3×3 Basketball. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(5), 523-528. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-03
BibTeX
@article{Mocrousov2026,
  title   = {Comparative Analysis of the Perception of the Training Process by Coaches and Female Athletes in 3×3 Basketball},
  author  = {Mocrousov Elena and Tugui Olga},
  journal = {Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies},
  year    = {2026},
  volume  = {2},
  number  = {5},
  pages   = {523-528},
  doi     = {10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-03},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-03}
}

Questions about this article

Who wrote this article?

Mocrousov Elena, Tugui Olga.

Where and when was it published?

In Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, Volume 2, Issue 5, pages 523-528, published by EP Journals Group on 5 May 2026.

Is this article free to read?

Yes. It is open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) licence, so anyone can read, share and reuse it with attribution.

What is the DOI of this article?

10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-03 (https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-03).

How do I cite this article?

APA: Mocrousov Elena, & Tugui Olga (2026). Comparative Analysis of the Perception of the Training Process by Coaches and Female Athletes in 3×3 Basketball. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(5), 523-528. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E5/2026-03

More research from JSSHRS

  • From Project-Like Activities to Project-Based Learning: Identifying PBL Characteristics in Event Management Courses at Ho Chi Minh City University of Culture

    Huynh Cong Duan, Vu Thi Bich Duyen · Oct 2026

  • Revisiting the Uncanny Valley in the AI Era: A Review of Visual Artifacts and Aesthetic Perceptions in AI-Generated Characters

    Muhan Li · Oct 2026

  • Development of Students’ Self-Learning Competence in Teaching Political Theory Subjects in the Digital Environment

    Vu Thi Ha · Oct 2026

  • The Double-Edged Sword of Digital Transformation in Cultural Scenic Areas: Heterogeneous Moderation of Qilu Cultural Genes on Technology-Value Conversion Paths

    Xu Lulu, Tara Ahmed Mohammed · Oct 2026

  • Experience in Applying Active Learning Methods in Probability and Statistics at Gia Lai Medical College

    Nguyen Nhu Tram · Oct 2026

← All articlesAbout JSSHRS and how to submit

Publisher

EP Journals Group

Publisher of peer-reviewed scholarly journals operating under a documented governance framework. Editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit and peer review, and the portfolio is published on a monthly frequency.

Country / jurisdiction: Published and administered internationally

Journals

  • Journals list (publisher site)

Policies

  • Publication Ethics
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Policies
  • Corrections & Retractions
  • Open Access
  • Complete policy index

Administration

Official contact email:
editor@ep-journals.org

Administrative note: Correspondence is logged for governance and audit purposes. Editorial enquiries answered within 24 hours. Editorial decisions typically within 1–2 weeks.

Compliance disclaimer: Indexing claims and database listings are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

© 2026 EP Journals Group. All rights reserved.

AboutJournalsArticlesFor AuthorsTemplatesEditorial BoardJoin the BoardIndexingFAQSubmitPublishPoliciesEthicsPeer ReviewContact

EP Journals Group operates under a documented policy framework. Editorial decisions are independent and are grounded in peer review and scholarly assessment. All journals are peer-reviewed, open-access, and published monthly. Indexing claims are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

Last site update: April 2026