Journals with Fast Peer Review
Identifying journals that complete peer review efficiently while maintaining substance
Fast peer review means a first decision in 14–28 days, with two reviewers and substantive comments. Achievable at journals with active editorial offices and broad reviewer pools. Faster than 14 days for full original articles usually indicates abbreviated rather than just efficient review.
Frequently Asked Questions
How fast can real peer review actually be?
14–28 days for first decision is achievable at well-run journals with broad reviewer pools. Short-format articles can be reviewed faster (7–14 days). Below this without explanation usually indicates abbreviated review.
Is single-blind faster than double-blind?
Marginally, but the difference is small. Speed depends more on reviewer pool breadth and editorial responsiveness than on blinding model.
Can I request expedited review?
Some journals offer formal fast-track services, sometimes with a fee. A polite enquiry to the editorial office before submission clarifies whether it is available.
Does fast review correlate with high acceptance?
No. Fast review and selectivity are independent. Some highly selective journals run efficient review; some accessible journals are slow.
What if review takes longer than the stated window?
Some variation is normal. If review extends 50% beyond the stated time without communication, a polite enquiry to the editorial office is appropriate.