Journals with Short Review Time
Identifying journals that complete first decisions in 14–28 days without skipping review
A short review time means a first editorial decision returned within 14–28 days, with two reviewers and substantive comments. The window is achievable through journals with active editorial offices and broad reviewer pools — and verifiable by examining recent articles' decision dates.
Frequently Asked Questions
How short can credible peer review actually be?
For full original articles: 14 days is achievable at well-run journals with broad reviewer pools, though 21–28 days is more common. For short-format articles: 7–14 days is achievable in rapid communications tracks. Below these ranges without explanation usually indicates abbreviated review.
What is the difference between short review time and short publication time?
Review time is submission to first decision; publication time is submission to online article. A journal with 14-day review and 6-week post-acceptance copy-editing has a short review time but a moderate publication time. Each window has different determinants.
Does single-blind review run faster than double-blind?
Marginally in some workflows, but the difference is usually small. Speed depends more on reviewer pool breadth and editorial responsiveness than on blinding model.
Can I confirm a journal's actual review pace?
Yes. Many journals print the dates 'submitted', 'revised', 'accepted', and 'published' on each article. Sampling three or four recent articles gives a clear view of the journal's actual pace. If the journal does not print these dates, it is harder to verify.
Should I worry if review takes longer than the stated window?
Some variation is normal; medians are not maxima. If review extends 50% beyond the stated time without communication, a polite enquiry to the editorial office is appropriate. Quoting the manuscript ID and submission date helps the office locate the file.