EP Journals Group logo
EP Journals GroupAcademic Publishing Organisation
Submit Paper
HomeAboutJournalsArticlesIndexingAuthor GuidelinesPublication ProcessEditorial BoardPoliciesContact

Knowledge Centre · Guide

The Impact of Open Access

How open-access publishing has changed reader access, author cost, and research dissemination

Last updated: April 2026 · 8 min read · Audience: Authors, students, early-career researchers · Reading level: Introductory

This guide is part of the Knowledge Centre maintained by EP Journals Group, an open access publisher of six peer-reviewed academic journals covering engineering and technology, economics and finance, management, natural sciences, social sciences, and education and finance. All journals operate under documented double-blind peer review with two independent reviewers, assign CrossRef DOIs on acceptance, and publish under a CC BY 4.0 licence.
Quick answer. Open access has materially increased reader access to research, particularly for non-academic readers and researchers at less-resourced institutions. It has also shifted cost from readers (subscriptions) to authors (APCs), expanded discoverability, and created new concerns including high APCs at flagship venues and predatory journals exploiting the author-pays model.

Introduction

Open access is the publishing model in which articles are freely available to readers without subscription or paywall. The shift toward open access has been one of the most significant changes in academic publishing since the move from print to online. Like any large change, it has produced both clear benefits and genuine costs.

This page surveys the impact across several dimensions. It does not advocate; both open-access and subscription publishing produce credible work, and the choice often involves trade-offs.

Impact across dimensions

DimensionEffect of open access
Reader accessSubstantially expanded; particularly for non-academic and less-resourced readers
Author costShifted from zero (in subscription) to APC (in many open-access)
Citation reachGenerally higher for open-access in many fields
Predatory venuesIncreased; the author-pays model is what predatory venues exploit
Funder relationshipsChanged; many funders now require open-access publication
Institutional budgetsMixed; subscription savings offset by APC costs in some cases

Benefits clearly attributable to open access

Reader access has expanded materially. Researchers at less-resourced institutions, non-academic professionals (clinicians, policymakers, journalists, practitioners), and global audiences all read open-access work more easily than paywalled work. The effect is particularly visible in fields where readers outside academia have substantial use for the research.

Citation reach is often higher for open-access articles, though the effect varies by field and is hard to isolate from other factors. Discoverability through open repositories and search engines is generally easier.

Costs and concerns

The author-pays model has produced real concerns: high APCs at flagship journals, uneven access for unfunded authors, and predatory venues exploiting the model. None of these invalidates open access, but each is real and shapes how authors should approach open-access journal selection.

Other concerns include the inequality between authors with institutional APC funding and those without, the rise of hybrid journals that charge both subscriptions and APCs, and the difficulty of distinguishing credible from predatory open-access venues without verification.

Decision guidance

For authors, the open-access decision should follow the audience and the budget. If readers outside well-resourced academic institutions matter for the work, open access offers real value. If funding is limited, the choice expands beyond the dichotomy: subscription, diamond open-access, low-APC open-access, and waiver-eligible high-APC are all viable paths.

Example scenarios

Scenario: a master's student choosing between models

Students whose work has practical applications (in education, public health, social services) benefit more from open access than those whose audience is concentrated at well-resourced research universities. The reader-access difference is real for the practitioner audience.

Scenario: a PhD researcher with funder mandate

Increasing numbers of funders require open-access publication. The relevant question becomes which open-access route fits — author-pays APC, transformative agreement, hybrid open-access, or repository deposit. The library is usually the right resource for navigating funder requirements.

Scenario: an early-career researcher in a low-income region

Authors from waiver-eligible countries can typically publish in major open-access journals at no cost. The waiver should be requested at submission. The audience reach in this case combines the open-access benefit with the cost mitigation; the model often works particularly well.

What to do next

Identify whether your audience benefits from open access and whether your budget supports it. Both factors should inform journal selection. Authors targeting EP Journals Group venues can review the open-access policies on each journal's site.

Frequently asked questions

About the publisher

Considering EP Journals Group for your next paper?

EP Journals Group publishes six peer-reviewed open access journals across engineering, economics, management, natural sciences, social sciences, and education. We operate a documented editorial workflow with transparent timelines and clear ethics policies — designed in particular for students, early-career researchers, and authors without large research budgets.

1–2 week peer review

Double-blind, two independent reviewers

Affordable APC

Fee waivers for unfunded researchers

CrossRef DOI

Permanent citation on every accepted article

Submit a manuscriptBrowse our journalsAbout EP Journals Group →

Related topics across the knowledge centre

Comparison

EP Journals vs Predatory Journals: How to Tell the Difference

A practical comparison helping researchers distinguish legitimate structured open-access publishers, such as EP Journals, from predatory journals that lack genuine peer review, transparent fees, or verifiable editorial governance.

Comparison

Indexed vs Non-Indexed Journals: A Practical Comparison

A practical comparison of indexed and non-indexed journals across multiple indexing tiers, helping authors interpret indexing claims accurately and choose venues whose indexing matches their needs.

Publishing

Low-Cost Research Journals

Low-cost journals span subscription venues with no author fee, diamond open-access journals fully subsidised by institutions, and open-access journals with modest APCs. Verifying credibility matters more than the headline number.

Publishing

How to Publish a Research Paper in Law

A practical, field-specific guide to publishing research in law, covering norms, challenges, the step-by-step process, where to publish, and how to choose between journal types.

Resource

Journals for Students: Where to Publish Early Research

Students are typically best served by open-access journals that maintain transparent peer review, modest article processing charges (APCs), and clearly documented timelines.

Resource

Journals for Multidisciplinary Research

Multidisciplinary work fits journals explicitly oriented toward cross-field research, generalist scientific journals, or specialty journals where the work's primary discipline anchors. The choice depends on which audience the work most needs to reach.

Guide

Avoiding Plagiarism in Academic Research

A clear explanation of what counts as plagiarism in academic research, how to avoid it in practice, and how journals detect and respond to it.

Guide

What is Indexing in Academic Journals?

An overview of how academic indexing operates, the principal categories of indexing services, and the implications of indexing status for authors and journals.

Related reading and next steps

  • Submission portal — Submit a manuscript through the central form
  • Journals list — Six peer-reviewed journals across disciplines
  • Understanding open access
  • Understanding APCs
  • Open access vs subscription
  • Low-cost research journals

Editorial enquiries

Questions about this guide or about preparing a manuscript for submission may be directed to the editorial office. Where a query relates to a specific journal in the portfolio, please indicate the journal abbreviation in your message.

Email: editor@ep-journals.org

Publication Standards

Review model: Double-blind peer review

Minimum reviewers: 2 per manuscript

Frequency: Monthly

Integrity checks: Editorial screening where required

Open access: Immediate (portfolio-level)

Quick Access

  • Journals list
  • Indexing & Abstracting
  • Author guidelines
  • Editorial board
  • Policies & governance
  • Contact / submissions

Submission Checklist

  • •Title page with author details
  • •Blinded manuscript file
  • •Abstract (150–300 words)
  • •Keywords (4–6)
  • •References in required format
  • •Figures and tables
  • •Conflict of interest statement

Indexing & compliance

Indexing and database claims are treated as subject to verification by the respective agencies. The publisher does not guarantee inclusion in any specific index.

Ethics procedures and correction notices are maintained to support the reliability of the scholarly record.

Portfolio Journals

    All journals: Monthly frequency

    Editorial Contact

    editor@ep-journals.org

    Response: Within 24 hours

    Publisher

    EP Journals Group

    Publisher of peer-reviewed scholarly journals operating under a documented governance framework. Editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit and peer review, and the portfolio is published on a monthly frequency.

    Country / jurisdiction: Published and administered internationally

    Journals

    • Journals list (publisher site)

    Policies

    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
    • Editorial Policies
    • Corrections & Retractions
    • Open Access
    • Complete policy index

    Administration

    Official contact email:
    editor@ep-journals.org

    Administrative note: Correspondence is logged for governance and audit purposes. Editorial enquiries answered within 24 hours. Editorial decisions typically within 1–2 weeks.

    Compliance disclaimer: Indexing claims and database listings are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

    © 2026 EP Journals Group. All rights reserved.

    AboutJournalsArticlesFor AuthorsEditorial BoardJoin the BoardIndexingSubmitPublishPoliciesEthicsPeer ReviewContact

    EP Journals Group operates under a documented policy framework. Editorial decisions are independent and are grounded in peer review and scholarly assessment. All journals are peer-reviewed, open-access, and published monthly. Indexing claims are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

    Last site update: April 2026