How to Respond to Reviewer Comments
A practical guide to writing a response to reviewer comments — covering structure, tone, what to accept, what to push back on, and how to maximise the chance of acceptance.
A practical guide to writing a response to reviewer comments — covering structure, tone, what to accept, what to push back on, and how to maximise the chance of acceptance.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long should I take to revise a manuscript?
Journals usually specify a window — commonly four to twelve weeks for major revisions and shorter for minor ones. If more time is needed, ask the editor; reasonable extensions are normally granted. Submitting a hasty revision is rarely worth the saved time.
What if I genuinely disagree with a reviewer?
Reasoned disagreement, supported by evidence or methodology, is acceptable and often respected by editors. Explain your position clearly in the response letter and, where helpful, in the manuscript itself. Avoid emotive language.
Should I make every change a reviewer suggests?
Most yes, some no. Where a suggestion would weaken the work or contradict another sound recommendation, decline with explanation. Editors expect authors to exercise judgement; what they do not accept is changes ignored without acknowledgement.
Is a response letter required for minor revisions at EP Journals?
Yes. EP Journals expects a point-by-point response document for all revisions, regardless of whether the request is for minor or major changes. The document allows the editor and, where relevant, the reviewers to verify that comments have been addressed.