EP Journals Group logo
EP Journals GroupAcademic Publishing Organisation
Submit Paper
HomeAboutJournalsArticlesIndexingAuthor GuidelinesPublication ProcessEditorial BoardPoliciesContact

Knowledge Centre · Guide

Academic Publishing Trends

Current trends shaping how research is reviewed, published, and accessed

Last updated: April 2026 · 7 min read · Audience: Authors, students, early-career researchers · Reading level: Introductory

This guide is part of the Knowledge Centre maintained by EP Journals Group, an open access publisher of six peer-reviewed academic journals covering engineering and technology, economics and finance, management, natural sciences, social sciences, and education and finance. All journals operate under documented double-blind peer review with two independent reviewers, assign CrossRef DOIs on acceptance, and publish under a CC BY 4.0 licence.
Quick answer. Five current trends are most consequential for authors: open access becoming dominant, preprints integrated into formal publication, AI in editorial workflows (with disclosure expectations), registered reports for pre-data peer review, and rising expectations for data and code availability. Authors do not need to lead these trends but should understand how they affect submissions.

Introduction

Academic publishing changes slowly relative to other industries, but several trends in the past decade have substantially altered the author experience. This page surveys trends that are likely to affect submissions over the next several years.

None of these trends has fully arrived. All are uneven across fields, contested in some respects, and likely to evolve. The discussion below is descriptive, not predictive.

Five trends

TrendStatusAuthor implication
Open access dominanceIncreasing across fieldsMore authors face APC questions
Preprint integrationWidely accepted; growing in coverageEarlier citability via preprint deposit
AI in editorial workflowNorms still forming; disclosure standardDisclose AI use; do not list AI as author
Registered reportsExpanding beyond psychologyPre-data review where applicable
Data / code availabilityIncreasingly requiredData availability statement standard; sharing expected

What each trend means

Open access dominance

New journals launch as open access more often than as subscription. Established subscription journals increasingly add open-access options. Funder mandates push the trend further. The practical implication is that authors will increasingly face the APC question; learning the alternatives (subscription, diamond, low-APC, waivers) becomes more useful.

Preprint integration

Preprint deposit (arXiv, SSRN, bioRxiv, ChemRxiv, others) is now widely accepted at most reputable journals. Some journals integrate preprint deposit directly into submission. The practical use: deposit a preprint at submission for an immediately citable version while peer review continues.

AI in editorial workflow

Authors using AI for writing assistance are now expected to disclose. Reviewers using AI to evaluate manuscripts may face restrictions (publishers worried about confidentiality). The norms are still settling, but disclosure has become standard at major publishers and not disclosing where used is treated as a transparency issue.

Registered reports

Registered reports submit the methodology for peer review before data collection. The article is accepted on the methodology's strength regardless of result. The format is growing in psychology and medicine and being piloted elsewhere; it directly addresses replication concerns.

Data and code availability

Data availability statements are now required at most credible journals. The expectation is increasingly that authors share the underlying data, code, and analysis materials in a public repository, with privacy and consent caveats addressed. Journals are also increasingly checking whether shared data actually exists at the URL provided.

Decision guidance

Authors should anticipate trends rather than react to them. Practical actions: deposit preprints, set up ORCID, use a reference manager, learn about institutional transformative agreements, and prepare data and code for sharing. None requires immediate change but each becomes more useful over time.

Example scenarios

Scenario: a master's student starting a project

Students starting new projects today should plan from the beginning for open-access publication, data sharing, and preprint deposit. Building these into the workflow from the start is far cheaper than retrofitting them at submission.

Scenario: a PhD researcher considering registered reports

Researchers whose research design is settled and whose methodology is sound can submit registered reports where available. The format guarantees acceptance based on methodology, removing some publication-decision uncertainty. Available journals are growing but still limited.

Scenario: an early-career researcher using AI tools

AI use in writing should be disclosed per the target journal's policy. Most policies allow AI for grammar, clarity, and translation but not as an author. Disclosure does not penalise authors; failing to disclose can be treated as a misconduct issue.

What to do next

Stay informed but do not over-react. Most fundamentals — peer review, indexing, scope fit — remain stable. Authors targeting EP Journals Group venues can submit through the central form.

Frequently asked questions

About the publisher

Considering EP Journals Group for your next paper?

EP Journals Group publishes six peer-reviewed open access journals across engineering, economics, management, natural sciences, social sciences, and education. We operate a documented editorial workflow with transparent timelines and clear ethics policies — designed in particular for students, early-career researchers, and authors without large research budgets.

1–2 week peer review

Double-blind, two independent reviewers

Affordable APC

Fee waivers for unfunded researchers

CrossRef DOI

Permanent citation on every accepted article

Submit a manuscriptBrowse our journalsAbout EP Journals Group →

Related topics across the knowledge centre

Comparison

EP Journals vs Predatory Journals: How to Tell the Difference

A practical comparison helping researchers distinguish legitimate structured open-access publishers, such as EP Journals, from predatory journals that lack genuine peer review, transparent fees, or verifiable editorial governance.

Comparison

Indexed vs Non-Indexed Journals: A Practical Comparison

A practical comparison of indexed and non-indexed journals across multiple indexing tiers, helping authors interpret indexing claims accurately and choose venues whose indexing matches their needs.

Publishing

Low-Cost Research Journals

Low-cost journals span subscription venues with no author fee, diamond open-access journals fully subsidised by institutions, and open-access journals with modest APCs. Verifying credibility matters more than the headline number.

Publishing

How to Publish a Research Paper in Law

A practical, field-specific guide to publishing research in law, covering norms, challenges, the step-by-step process, where to publish, and how to choose between journal types.

Resource

Journals for Students: Where to Publish Early Research

Students are typically best served by open-access journals that maintain transparent peer review, modest article processing charges (APCs), and clearly documented timelines.

Resource

Journals for Multidisciplinary Research

Multidisciplinary work fits journals explicitly oriented toward cross-field research, generalist scientific journals, or specialty journals where the work's primary discipline anchors. The choice depends on which audience the work most needs to reach.

Guide

Avoiding Plagiarism in Academic Research

A clear explanation of what counts as plagiarism in academic research, how to avoid it in practice, and how journals detect and respond to it.

Guide

What is Indexing in Academic Journals?

An overview of how academic indexing operates, the principal categories of indexing services, and the implications of indexing status for authors and journals.

Related reading and next steps

  • Submission portal — Submit a manuscript through the central form
  • Journals list — Six peer-reviewed journals across disciplines
  • Understanding open access
  • How to publish a research paper
  • Open access vs subscription
  • Publishing in engineering

Editorial enquiries

Questions about this guide or about preparing a manuscript for submission may be directed to the editorial office. Where a query relates to a specific journal in the portfolio, please indicate the journal abbreviation in your message.

Email: editor@ep-journals.org

Publication Standards

Review model: Double-blind peer review

Minimum reviewers: 2 per manuscript

Frequency: Monthly

Integrity checks: Editorial screening where required

Open access: Immediate (portfolio-level)

Quick Access

  • Journals list
  • Indexing & Abstracting
  • Author guidelines
  • Editorial board
  • Policies & governance
  • Contact / submissions

Submission Checklist

  • •Title page with author details
  • •Blinded manuscript file
  • •Abstract (150–300 words)
  • •Keywords (4–6)
  • •References in required format
  • •Figures and tables
  • •Conflict of interest statement

Indexing & compliance

Indexing and database claims are treated as subject to verification by the respective agencies. The publisher does not guarantee inclusion in any specific index.

Ethics procedures and correction notices are maintained to support the reliability of the scholarly record.

Portfolio Journals

    All journals: Monthly frequency

    Editorial Contact

    editor@ep-journals.org

    Response: Within 24 hours

    Publisher

    EP Journals Group

    Publisher of peer-reviewed scholarly journals operating under a documented governance framework. Editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit and peer review, and the portfolio is published on a monthly frequency.

    Country / jurisdiction: Published and administered internationally

    Journals

    • Journals list (publisher site)

    Policies

    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
    • Editorial Policies
    • Corrections & Retractions
    • Open Access
    • Complete policy index

    Administration

    Official contact email:
    editor@ep-journals.org

    Administrative note: Correspondence is logged for governance and audit purposes. Editorial enquiries answered within 24 hours. Editorial decisions typically within 1–2 weeks.

    Compliance disclaimer: Indexing claims and database listings are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

    © 2026 EP Journals Group. All rights reserved.

    AboutJournalsArticlesFor AuthorsEditorial BoardJoin the BoardIndexingSubmitPublishPoliciesEthicsPeer ReviewContact

    EP Journals Group operates under a documented policy framework. Editorial decisions are independent and are grounded in peer review and scholarly assessment. All journals are peer-reviewed, open-access, and published monthly. Indexing claims are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

    Last site update: April 2026