EP Journals Group logo
EP Journals GroupAcademic Publishing Organisation
Submit Paper
HomeAboutJournalsArticlesIndexingAuthor GuidelinesPublication ProcessEditorial BoardPoliciesContact

Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Research (GJETR)

Systematic Review of Predictive Safety Analytics Applications in LNG Projects with ESG Implications

Arumosoye, Oluwakemi Motunrayo, Obriki, Oghenepawon David, Ozobu, Cynthia Obianuju

24 February 2026 · Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 61-73

DOI: 10.65150/EP-gjetr/V2E2/2026-05

Abstract

The liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry operates within high-hazard project environments where operational safety, environmental sustainability, and governance considerations are tightly intertwined. This systematic review examines the applications of predictive safety analytics in LNG projects and explores their implications for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. Predictive safety analytics leverage historical data, real-time monitoring, and advanced modeling techniques such as machine learning, statistical forecasting, and hazard trend analysis to anticipate incidents before they occur, thereby enhancing proactive risk management. The review synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed literature, industry reports, and case studies to identify prevailing methodologies, implementation strategies, and outcomes associated with predictive safety applications in LNG operations. Key insights highlight that predictive analytics enable the early identification of latent hazards, unsafe behaviors, and procedural deviations, allowing project teams to implement timely interventions that reduce the likelihood of injuries, operational disruptions, and environmental incidents. The analysis further underscores the importance of integrating predictive insights into decision-making, safety governance, and ESG reporting, illustrating how safety performance metrics can align with environmental compliance, social responsibility, and corporate governance objectives. Challenges associated with implementation, including data quality, multi-contractor integration, workforce adoption, and cultural barriers, are also examined, providing a nuanced understanding of the organizational conditions required for successful adoption. The review identifies research gaps, particularly in longitudinal validation of predictive models, cross-project benchmarking, and quantitative assessment of ESG outcomes linked to safety analytics. Future directions emphasize the development of standardized leading indicators, multi-level predictive frameworks, and industry-specific adaptation strategies to enhance both safety and ESG performance in LNG projects. By systematically evaluating predictive safety analytics in LNG operations, this review contributes to the emerging body of knowledge at the intersection of project safety, risk forecasting, and ESG management, offering actionable insights for practitioners, researchers, and policymakers seeking to leverage data-driven approaches for sustainable and injury-free project performance.

Keywords: Predictive safety analytics, LNG projects, leading safety indicators, ESG performance, risk forecasting, proactive safety management, operational resilience

Read the full text on Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Research →The full peer-reviewed article and PDF are hosted on the journal's site (the version of record).

Cite this article

APA
Arumosoye, Oluwakemi Motunrayo, Obriki, Oghenepawon David, Ozobu, & Cynthia Obianuju (2026). Systematic Review of Predictive Safety Analytics Applications in LNG Projects with ESG Implications. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 2(2), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-gjetr/V2E2/2026-05
BibTeX
@article{Arumosoye2026,
  title   = {Systematic Review of Predictive Safety Analytics Applications in LNG Projects with ESG Implications},
  author  = {Arumosoye and Oluwakemi Motunrayo and Obriki and Oghenepawon David and Ozobu and Cynthia Obianuju},
  journal = {Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Research},
  year    = {2026},
  volume  = {2},
  number  = {2},
  pages   = {61-73},
  doi     = {10.65150/EP-gjetr/V2E2/2026-05},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-gjetr/V2E2/2026-05}
}

Related articles in GJETR

  • Climate-Resilient Foundation Design for Coastal Infrastructure Under Rising Groundwater Conditions: A Review

    Olukoju, John Ayomide, Oladosu, Micheal Abimbola · Sept 2026

  • The Compliance Gap: Why Audit-Based Cybersecurity Models Fail Critical Infrastructure and the Case for Continuous Control

    Amadi, Chukwunenye · Sept 2026

  • Edge-Optimized YOLO Architectures for Real-Time Autonomous Vehicle Perception: A Hardware-Aware Co-Design Framework

    Christian Sankara, Harouna Wendpanga Yann, Oyesiji, Serif Oyindamola, Aalaj, Emmanuel Eniola, Nwakamma, Stanley · Sept 2026

  • A Hardware-In-The-Loop CI/CD Validation Framework for IoT and Vehicle Embedded Systems Using C# and Azure Devops

    Ndupu, Kingsley Chinazaekpere, Ajala, Emmanuel Eniola, Oyesiji, Serif Oyindamola, Nwakamma, Stanley · Sept 2026

  • Predictive Maintenance Metrics in the Minimisation of Non-Routine Flaring from Rotating Machinery Failure: A Review of Condition Monitoring, Prognostics and the Conditional Chain from Early Detection to Avoided Emergency Pressure Relief

    Ekelemu, Oghenekaro, Akano, Oluwaseyi Ayotunde, Adikwu, Friday Emmanuel, Amarahobu, Chibuzor · Sept 2026

← Back to all articles

Publisher

EP Journals Group

Publisher of peer-reviewed scholarly journals operating under a documented governance framework. Editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit and peer review, and the portfolio is published on a monthly frequency.

Country / jurisdiction: Published and administered internationally

Journals

  • Journals list (publisher site)

Policies

  • Publication Ethics
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Policies
  • Corrections & Retractions
  • Open Access
  • Complete policy index

Administration

Official contact email:
editor@ep-journals.org

Administrative note: Correspondence is logged for governance and audit purposes. Editorial enquiries answered within 24 hours. Editorial decisions typically within 1–2 weeks.

Compliance disclaimer: Indexing claims and database listings are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

© 2026 EP Journals Group. All rights reserved.

AboutJournalsArticlesFor AuthorsTemplatesEditorial BoardJoin the BoardIndexingSubmitPublishPoliciesEthicsPeer ReviewContact

EP Journals Group operates under a documented policy framework. Editorial decisions are independent and are grounded in peer review and scholarly assessment. All journals are peer-reviewed, open-access, and published monthly. Indexing claims are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

Last site update: April 2026