EP Journals Group logo
EP Journals GroupAcademic Publishing Organisation
Submit Paper
HomeAboutJournalsArticlesIndexingAuthor GuidelinesPublication ProcessEditorial BoardPoliciesContact

Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Research (GJETR) · Research article · Open access

Systematic Review of Predictive Safety Analytics Applications in LNG Projects with ESG Implications

Oluwakemi Motunrayo Arumosoye, Oghenepawon David Obriki, Cynthia Obianuju Ozobu

24 February 2026 · Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 61-73

DOI: 10.65150/EP-gjetr/V2E2/2026-05

Download full text (PDF)Cite this article

What is this article about?

The liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry operates within high-hazard project environments where operational safety, environmental sustainability, and governance considerations are tightly intertwined. This systematic review examines the applications of predictive safety analytics in LNG projects and explores their implications for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance.

Article at a glance

Journal
Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Research (GJETR)
Published
24 February 2026
Volume / issue / pages
Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 61-73
ISSN
3051-3782 (online) · 3051-3774 (print)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 — free to read and reuse with attribution
Peer review
Double-blind, at least two independent reviewers
Publisher
EP Journals Group

Abstract

The liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry operates within high-hazard project environments where operational safety, environmental sustainability, and governance considerations are tightly intertwined. This systematic review examines the applications of predictive safety analytics in LNG projects and explores their implications for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. Predictive safety analytics leverage historical data, real-time monitoring, and advanced modeling techniques such as machine learning, statistical forecasting, and hazard trend analysis to anticipate incidents before they occur, thereby enhancing proactive risk management. The review synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed literature, industry reports, and case studies to identify prevailing methodologies, implementation strategies, and outcomes associated with predictive safety applications in LNG operations. Key insights highlight that predictive analytics enable the early identification of latent hazards, unsafe behaviors, and procedural deviations, allowing project teams to implement timely interventions that reduce the likelihood of injuries, operational disruptions, and environmental incidents. The analysis further underscores the importance of integrating predictive insights into decision-making, safety governance, and ESG reporting, illustrating how safety performance metrics can align with environmental compliance, social responsibility, and corporate governance objectives. Challenges associated with implementation, including data quality, multi-contractor integration, workforce adoption, and cultural barriers, are also examined, providing a nuanced understanding of the organizational conditions required for successful adoption. The review identifies research gaps, particularly in longitudinal validation of predictive models, cross-project benchmarking, and quantitative assessment of ESG outcomes linked to safety analytics. Future directions emphasize the development of standardized leading indicators, multi-level predictive frameworks, and industry-specific adaptation strategies to enhance both safety and ESG performance in LNG projects. By systematically evaluating predictive safety analytics in LNG operations, this review contributes to the emerging body of knowledge at the intersection of project safety, risk forecasting, and ESG management, offering actionable insights for practitioners, researchers, and policymakers seeking to leverage data-driven approaches for sustainable and injury-free project performance.

Keywords: Predictive safety analytics, LNG projects, leading safety indicators, ESG performance, risk forecasting, proactive safety management, operational resilience

Cite this article

APA
Oluwakemi Motunrayo Arumosoye, Oghenepawon David Obriki, & Cynthia Obianuju Ozobu (2026). Systematic Review of Predictive Safety Analytics Applications in LNG Projects with ESG Implications. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 2(2), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-gjetr/V2E2/2026-05
BibTeX
@article{Oluwakemi2026,
  title   = {Systematic Review of Predictive Safety Analytics Applications in LNG Projects with ESG Implications},
  author  = {Oluwakemi Motunrayo Arumosoye and Oghenepawon David Obriki and Cynthia Obianuju Ozobu},
  journal = {Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Research},
  year    = {2026},
  volume  = {2},
  number  = {2},
  pages   = {61-73},
  doi     = {10.65150/EP-gjetr/V2E2/2026-05},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-gjetr/V2E2/2026-05}
}

Questions about this article

Who wrote this article?

Oluwakemi Motunrayo Arumosoye, Oghenepawon David Obriki, Cynthia Obianuju Ozobu.

Where and when was it published?

In Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, Volume 2, Issue 2, pages 61-73, published by EP Journals Group on 24 February 2026.

Is this article free to read?

Yes. It is open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) licence, so anyone can read, share and reuse it with attribution.

What is the DOI of this article?

10.65150/EP-gjetr/V2E2/2026-05 (https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-gjetr/V2E2/2026-05).

How do I cite this article?

APA: Oluwakemi Motunrayo Arumosoye, Oghenepawon David Obriki, & Cynthia Obianuju Ozobu (2026). Systematic Review of Predictive Safety Analytics Applications in LNG Projects with ESG Implications. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 2(2), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-gjetr/V2E2/2026-05

More research from GJETR

  • Optimized Deep Convolutional Networks for MRI Brain Tumor Classification and Segmentation: A Systematic Review

    Maher Talal Al-Asaady · Oct 2026

  • Industry Micro-Credential Infusion in PQF Level 5 Technology Diploma Programs: Opportunities and Challenges

    Gamaliel B. Vicente Jr., Alma O. Medio, Redjie D. Arcadio · Oct 2026

  • Assessment of Process Mapping, Risk Management, and Iso 9001 Quality Management Standards: Basis for a Technology-Enabled Quality Management Framework

    Patrick E. Arendain, Redjie D. Arcadio · Oct 2026

  • Integrating Solar-Powered PV Cells And SCR-Controlled Three-Phase Rectifiers to Design A Two-Level DC Grid Architecture

    Sadia Sultana Turna, Amzad Ali Sarkar · Oct 2026

  • Density Functional Theory Investigation of Defect-Induced Electronic Behavior in Iodine-Deficient Mapbi₃ Perovskites for Solar Cells

    Sani Kado, Muhammad Y. Onimisi, Dahiru M. Sanni · Sept 2026

← All articlesAbout GJETR and how to submit

Publisher

EP Journals Group

Publisher of peer-reviewed scholarly journals operating under a documented governance framework. Editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit and peer review, and the portfolio is published on a monthly frequency.

Country / jurisdiction: Published and administered internationally

Journals

  • Journals list (publisher site)

Policies

  • Publication Ethics
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Policies
  • Corrections & Retractions
  • Open Access
  • Complete policy index

Administration

Official contact email:
editor@ep-journals.org

Administrative note: Correspondence is logged for governance and audit purposes. Editorial enquiries answered within 24 hours. Editorial decisions typically within 1–2 weeks.

Compliance disclaimer: Indexing claims and database listings are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

© 2026 EP Journals Group. All rights reserved.

AboutJournalsArticlesFor AuthorsTemplatesEditorial BoardJoin the BoardIndexingFAQSubmitPublishPoliciesEthicsPeer ReviewContact

EP Journals Group operates under a documented policy framework. Editorial decisions are independent and are grounded in peer review and scholarly assessment. All journals are peer-reviewed, open-access, and published monthly. Indexing claims are subject to verification by the respective agencies.

Last site update: April 2026